Manure is better than fertilizers because of fallowing points:
1. It is cheaper than Fertilizers.
2. It is easily available by the wastes of animals.
3. It does not pollute earth.
both
no
Any fertilizer is better on poor soil than no fertilizer. too much of any single fertilizer is also bad for plants. Little and often is best.
Controlled contents and releases are reasons why fertilizers can be better than manures. Fertilizers have to comply with application, labeling and proportion requirements. Plant and soil enrichment programs offer pathogen-, pest-, weed-free, slow-release applications that will not be guaranteed by manure (that is not composted).
Fertilizer that is produced synthetically is what inorganic manure means. Exudates refer to plant wastes while manure references animal wastes or laboratory-produced fertilizer.
Becuase leaves and animal poo is biodegradable, which means it can be dissolved easily (unlike stuff like plastic and metal), and it is also very good for the plants because it isn't artificial like fertilizer u can buy in shops - it's organic.
Most manures are good fertilizers, and improve plant growth.
Sometimes it is better if you keep your plant inside. If you want your plant to be growing faster you have to use fertilizer and keep it outside
Manure IS a fertilizer ! I think you may mean to say artificial fertilizer - which has energy costs as well as requiring the use of resources such as petroleum.
farmers use a mixture of manures and fertilizers so that the nutrients which cannot be fulfilled by the manures can be fulfilled by the plants and the nutrients which are not in the fertilizers can be fulfilled by the manures ex-NPK [nitrogen, phosphate and potassium] fulfill the nutrients which are not present in the manures
"Surname" is a anagram for manures.
The manure could be used as fertilizer and enrich the soil thus feeding the worms and the birds get plump healthy worms to eat