answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

About 22 animals die every second in testing labs around the world each second.

So 22 x 32,536,000(seconds in a calendar year) = 693,792,000 animals die every year.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How many animals died last year from animal testing?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How many animals a year die from animal testing in new zealand?

Animal testing occurs in New Zealand. Here are some paragraphs from other web pages that provide the scope of such testing. In 2008, there were 341,520 animals used for research, testing and teaching - a 38.5% increase of animal testing from the previous year and the highest number used in the last ten years. The majority of animal experiments conducted in New Zealand are aimed to increase the profits and productivity of the agricultural industries. The rest is for commercial and medical purposes. In New Zealand, as in many countries, laboratory animals (mainly rodents) and farm animals (mainly cattle and sheep) are used in research, testing and teaching - commonly referred to as RTT.


How is animal testing inhumane?

There are pro's and cons to animal testing. It can help discover life saving treatments for humans and other animals. However, it is sometimes said that animal testing is inhumane because the animals are in pain, or are not taken care of. However, there are government standards on research labs. The animals do not feel pain, and even though they may die eventually, they often live as long as a normal household pet.


Is there an animal suffering from deforestation in the amazon rainforest?

I have heard in the last three years at least 600,000 animals have died


Is animal testing in the UK?

Last I heard, Yes; it has been out lawed there.


Is animal testing cruel?

No. Animal testing is a necessary part of research. Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not existed, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today. When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs: Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort. Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible. Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner. Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Remember, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences. This is no more flawed than a person trying to rescue and free animals, only to unknowingly and unintentionally kill them. It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.


Where is the last animal on Sim animals Africa?

On the last level. (I FORGET WHAT IT'S CALLED) The animal is gorilla.


Is Animism wrong?

Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!


Is animal testing wrong?

Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!


When was the last time animals were freed from being tested on?

Its important to conduct some tests on animals so that one can understand the mechanism of diseases and reaction behaviour. Some of the cosmetics are tested on animal skins, most of the medicines are checked on animals for side reactions. Although some of the country governments have anti-animal testing laws pertaining to cosmetics and medicines, but for advancements.


What is the last animal on Sim Animals Africa?

On Sim animals Africa DS, the last animal is the raptor in the Jungle Ruins. When you've completed the goals, a egg will hatch and out comes the raptor!


Can animals learn to deal with animal testing?

Animals have a surprising way of dealing with the testing they are put through. First of all the animals can easily turn of all sensory organs and are therefore unable to feel anything that the doctors do. Also they are given a choice of what food they want to eat prior to entering a life threatening test. Ironically enough the prime choice for their last meal is a hamburger with fries. As anyone can clearly see the animals subjected to testing have already come to terms with their fate and from then on they are comfortable in their environment.


When the last individual of a group of animal died the animal is said to be?

The animal species is said to be extinct.