0
What else can I help you with?
Was ancient Rome's economy based on social classes?
no it is not
What were the two main social groups in rome?
There were seven social classes in ancient Rome. they were the patricians, plebeians, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen, the slaves and foreigners. The last "class" the foreigners, were not Roman but many of them lived in the city and did not fit in with any Roman class.
What two classes existed in ancient Rome?
Plebeians: The underclass of Roman society.Patricians: The wealthy and powerful in Rome.
Which reform if gaius gracchus was opposed by the lower classes of rome?
Making the Italian allies citizens of Rome.
What were the classes of ancient Rome?
The plebians, equites/equestrians and patricians.
What are 2 social classes called in Rome?
There were three classes in Rome. The patricians were an aristocracy and owners of large landed estates. The Equites (equestrians, cavalrymen) were an entrepreneurial group: bankers, moneylenders, merchants and investors in shipping and mining. The plebeians were the poor.
What the two main social classes in Rome?
NovaNet Answer: the patricians and plebeians
What were the two main social-classes in rome?
NovaNet Answer: the patricians and plebeians
What where the two classes in the Roman Empire?
The Patricians and the Plebeians. These were the two original classes of Roman society. As the city and empire grew, a middle class called the equestrians arose and also many people came to Rome to live and work and they were neither Patrician, Plebeian, nor Equestrian. They were the Proletariat.
What were the five classes of people in the roman empire?
The five classes of people in the the city of Rome were the patricians, the plebeians, the equites, the proletariat and the slaves.
Who is members of the roman non- aristocratic class?
Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.Only the patricians an the plebeians were members of the aristocratic clas in ancient Rome. All other classes, the equites, the proletariat, the freedmen and the slaves, were non-aristocrates.
Where was the social classes in anchien rome?
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
