0
What else can I help you with?
Is mustard nasty?
There are no absolute subjective judgments. To one person mustard is awful, to another it is delicious. And both are right - for themselves, but not for anyone else.
What is transferability?
to pass something from one to another
What are the judgments one may receive when he brings up civil action against another person?
The most common remedy is an award of damages (payment of money). There are other possibilies such as specific performance (the person would have to fulfill an obligation).
How do judgments affect obtaining title insurance?
When transferring title from one owner to another, all liens or judgments should be cleared prior to transfer or you will not be able to insure properly
What is enthnocentrism?
Ethnocentrism is making value judgments about another culture from perspectives of one's own cultural system.
What is a person function?
person`s function is to love one another to have a many friends
What is suspending one's ethnocentric judgements in order to understand and appreciate another culture?
Suspending one's ethnocentric judgments in order to understand and appreciate another culture
What does it mean when one person surpasses another?
The term "when one person surpasses another" means that one person has overtaken another. It also means that one person does something better than another.
What is the meaning of interpersonal sensitivity?
Interpersonal sensitivity refers to the accuracy and/or appropriateness of perceptions, judgments, and responses we have with respect to one another.
How many deferred judgments is a person allowed?
Customarily, only one. If, according to your record, you apparently did not learn your lesson the first time, most judges are unwilling to give you a second bite at the apple.
Could it be that good spiritual healers don't pass judgments they believe that to love one another means tolerance of belief?
Yes.
Which ancient greek philosopher believed collective judgments were more likely to be wise?
Aristotle thought so, the theory being that one man judges one "part" better than others, and another man another part, so that the many collectively may judge better than an individual expert.
