5
there were 6 king Williams
There have only been two kings with the regnal names of Charles in Britain.
There was no single King of Britain at that time. It was, for the most part a tribal society, with MANY chieftains of or 'kings.'
four
1895 - But there are many George's of Britain so you have to be specific. I, II, III, IV?
there have been 3 king richards
Gosh, Britain has been in so many they are hard to count.
4 Australian titles
Four
There have been many battles fought in Britain you may mean the Battle of Britain if you are refering to WW2.
Most of the colonists were descended from people who came from Britain. Many of them still have relatives in Britain. They had been ruled by the king for their whole life and many of them respected the king and his government. To rebel was thus a huge step. It was also risky. The war would be costly and Britain had large military resources. It was possible to lose and if they lost, they would not only lose the cost of the war, but the British government would no doubt impose punitive measures on everybody and hang the leaders.
King Arthur... he was real right?!?! Not necessarily. There are some historical records that relate to a King Arthur that brought the various tribes of Great Britain together, but there is no historical evidence of the Arthurian legend as it is 'known' by many. There is a growing school of thought that he may have been real, but the Britain the legend refers to may not be the Britain we know now. Alternatively, there is a school of thought that King Arthur himself is a melding of the deeds of many people into one character and story. "La Morte D'Arthur" by Sir Thomas Mallory (1485) has long been considered to be "the" source for Arthurian "facts", however, there are allegations that Mallory's book may have been plagiarised from a much earlier work based on a "Christian Soldier" style king in the region of Normandy.