15
he fought for the south but deserted to log on the McCoy's land. I am direct blood relation to both sides and have heard every story and the story on the history channel is a lil skewed.
the hatfield and mccoy feud lasted 12 years Wrong. The feud started before the civil war and ended, atleast west of the Mississippi, in Silver City, New Mexico in 1973. That is where the patriarch of the Hatfields, one William Riley Hatfield, met with the patriarch of the McCoys and agreed to halt the feud. On the East side of the Mississippi, the feud still goes on but with politics as the weapon instead of guns. Once a year, there is even a 'family reunion' with both sides of the feuders showing up and competing in games and old fashioned fun. No 'shooting people' allowed.
During the Hatfield-McCoy feud, firearms commonly used included revolvers and rifles, with calibers like .44 and .45 being prevalent. The feud, which occurred in the late 19th century, saw both families utilizing the weapons of the time, including Winchester rifles and Colt revolvers. These calibers were typical of the era and suited for both hunting and conflict.
Both Sides - 1994 Teen Killed in Car Crash was released on: USA: 4 January 2006
300,000 Union soldiers killed (battle, sickness, wounds) 250,000 Confederates killed
to not get killed by each other
About 1,492,846 on both sides of the conflict including 58,220 from the US.
We killed the right ones.
The effect of a more protracted war with Japan would have had negative results for both sides. Many thousands would have been killed or wounded on both sides and the resources of both sides would have been seriously depleted.
Battle casualties, from both sides (all American), approximately 800,000.
If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.
In World War 1, trench warfare often resulted in a stalemate between opposing sides, which killed nearly as many men as open warfare would have. In trench warfare, disease and infections killed many of the soldiers on both sides.