Want this question answered?
none because........ sorry a hair can have 10000 cells. its amazing how little as a piece of hair have 10000 cells
none because........ sorry a hair can have 10000 cells. its amazing how little as a piece of hair have 10000 cells
The microscope that is more useful to estimate red blood cells is an electron microscope because it can magnify to see cells that other microscopes can't see such as the light microscope
A simple version of a compound microscope was used to discover cells. Robert Hooke first described cells in 1665, using a compound microscope. Soon after, Anton van Leeuwenhoek also studied cells using a microscope with more advanced lenses.
*
Single cells are the smallest cells that can preform all of the function in life and cannot be seen without a microscope. The above answer should say most cells can not be seen without a microscope. There are exceptions to this rule as say a chicken egg or 2 foot long strands of neurons are also single cells.
Light microscope were used to discover cells
The instrument that is used to study cells is a microscope.
A microscope.
none because........ sorry a hair can have 10000 cells. its amazing how little as a piece of hair have 10000 cells
none because........ sorry a hair can have 10000 cells. its amazing how little as a piece of hair have 10000 cells
The microscope that is more useful to estimate red blood cells is an electron microscope because it can magnify to see cells that other microscopes can't see such as the light microscope
Because cells are way to small to see without a microscope.
No...you could see cells with a microscope.
Robert Hooke is credited for discovering and naming the cells found in both living and dead organisms. Using the bark of a cork tree, he was the first to see cells under a microscope.
by a microscope
with a microscope