South Carolina seceded in December 1860, in response to Lincoln's election win. Six more states had followed suit by the time Lincoln rejected the last Compromise (which would have allowed some new slave-states), and after the Confederates fired on Forth Sumter in April 1861, another four states joined them, making eleven in all.
Lincoln's election win in 1860 - it meant there would be no new slave states, so if the South did not secede, they would always be outvoted in Congress.
Southern states claimed that their right to own slaves was being threatened by the federal government, particularly with the election of Abraham Lincoln as president. They believed secession was necessary to preserve their economic and social system based on slavery.
Actually, Lincoln was on the ballot in Kentucky, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, and Missouri.The Northern (free) states comprised 183 electoral votes (60.4%). The Southern (slave) states comprised just 120 electoral votes (39.6%). Lincoln won every free state except New Jersey.
Kentucky was a slave holding state that did not join the confederacy. Lincoln is quoted as having said something to the effect that if he could not win Kentucky he could not win the war. Also, once Lincoln issued the immacipation proclimation, only slaves within states that had joined the confederacy were free, meaning that Kentucky could still legally continue to own slaves.
Lincoln's election win, on a ticket of no new slave-states
Lincoln's election win, on a ticket of no new slave-states
Lincoln's win in 1860 on a ticket of no new slave-states. This meant that the South would always be outvoted in Congress.
Lincoln's win in 1860 on a ticket of no new slave-states. This meant that the South would always be outvoted in Congress.
Lincoln won the election because, although Stephen Douglas was very popular, he wanted to free the slaves and there were more free states than slave states at the time. =]
Some slave states had stayed on the side of the North. If Lincoln had abolished slavery early on in the war, those states might have joined the South, making the war that much harder to win.
South Carolina seceded in December 1860, in response to Lincoln's election win. Six more states had followed suit by the time Lincoln rejected the last Compromise (which would have allowed some new slave-states), and after the Confederates fired on Forth Sumter in April 1861, another four states joined them, making eleven in all.
He did not win a single electoral vote from any states in the South. He won zero elections in the South.
December 20th 1860. It was a direct reaction to Lincoln's election win on a ticket of no new slave-states.
The free-soil North won against the slave-owning Confederacy. However, there were four slave-owning states on the Northern side, and Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation did not free those slaves. This confirms that the Proclamation was not really to do with Abolitonism. It was an urgent tactical measure to keep the British from supporting the Confederates, because it would have made them look pro-slavery.
Lincoln's election win in 1860 - it meant there would be no new slave states, so if the South did not secede, they would always be outvoted in Congress.
No he didn't