Children had to start working at the age of six because they family didn't have money.
Some of them were apprentices; this means that they don't get any money but the factory provides food and shelter for them.
None
1
not bad... not bad.
it is very bad to have child labours they have to study they do not have to work in any places as a child i want to say this
because it's bad.
in the 1800s, why were many labor strikes unsuccessful?
Children were especially susceptible to the diseases and also child labor.
No, if the child is 13 years and over you should be able to work.
They worked to pass new laws to prohibit or limit child labor.
it was painful when i had my kid on the farm.
Until child labor laws were created, child labor was cheap labor and working in very bad conditions was the norm. Factory owners got cheap labor, which increased their profits considerably.
Very bad currently. North Korea doesn't claim to have child labor and child labor is outlawed in article 31 of the DPRK Constitution they have "voluntary services" for the children after school. "voluntary services" is not actually voluntary. it is actually forces and the children are forced to work on public projects everyday after school. they are also forced to use their own tools.
Child labor and bad working conditions.
The effects of child labor became a contentious subject in the late 1800s in the United States. The conditions in which children worked in particular helped lead to widespread social and labor reforms.