Want this question answered?
Vandalism and Malicious Mischief refers to intentional damage or destruction caused to property by individuals with malicious intent. This can include acts such as graffiti, broken windows, or other forms of deliberate harm. It is typically covered under property insurance policies, although specific coverage may vary.
Vandalism is willful wanton and malicious destruction of the property of others.
Generally, losing something is not the same as malicious destruction of property. In order to prove that someone maliciously destroyed property the remains of the property having been destroyed is normally presented as evidence of such destruction. The misplacement or loss of something would be considered more of an accident -- something for which you could be sued in civil court, but probably not prosecuted for in criminal court.
Answer may depend upon who owned it (you, someone else, partly yours), why you had it (borrowed, entrusted), how destruction occurred (malicious, reckless, negligent, unforeseeable accident), what type of property it was (irreplaceable, valuable to all, sentimental value only, intangible property), and where it occurred (which state/country), among other things.
Different jurisdictions can have varying statutes that cover this particular type of offense. Several that come to mind are: 'Vandalism,' 'Destruction of Pproperty,' 'Destruction of Moveable Property,' etc.
It seems unlikely that would occur. Spittle can be cleaned and does not destroy the garment.
Malicious Destruction Theft Larceny by conversion Larceny by trick petit theft Grand Theft .
Sounds more like vandalism although destruction is a more serious charge. they would have to illustrate how it would no longer function.
By any objective standard, yes. It amounted to (at the very least) trespass, vandalism, and malicious destruction of property.
Malicious Destruction Theft Larceny by conversion Larceny by trick petit theft Grand Theft .
annihilation
Fine, jail, prison, or all of the above