It would be best to do some research on the internet about the two different types of phones. It has been noted that the reception can be bad for Sprint in certain areas and AT&T have poor connectivity, so I think it is a matter of choice, and making sure that your phone will work correctly in the area that you work, and reside.
This is a matter of opinion. There are mixed reviews on both sony and sprint phones. Sony is traditionally a better brand than sprint. Both has excellent customer service.
Sprint as you go is the name of their no-contract option. Plans start as low as $35 /month or $45/month for smartphones. With a no-contract plan, you buy the phone outright. Depending on what package you want, no-contract phones can be a good option.
Sprint PCS offers a 3G network which can be much faster than other service providers.
The cost of PBX versus sprint cell phones depends on the phone system that you do have. Contact your carrier, and they will be able to give you more details.
To me i think sprint is better than Verizon.
Sprint has better pricing, at&t has better customer service, and more coverage.
atnt is goes faster than sprint.
"Boost is actually owned by Sprint, the major advantage it offers is security in the knowlege that the phones can only use the credits that you put on them."
Yes because more flip phones break than slide phones so slide phones are obviously better
When I was in Daniels, I had a better signal than my friends with sprint phones. I have been a verizon customer for the past two years and they have done me well.
Virgin Mobile phones are not listed in the top ten most reliable phones. It could be that is because they don't have a network that is as large as those in the top ten. However, if you live in an area that has an extensive Virgin Mobile network, you will probably have great luck with the phone!
no