Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
Judas got nothing from the Romans. Judas betrayed Jesus to the Jewish authorities and they gave him 30 pieces of silver, not the Romans.
At the top of Jesus' head was a sign that denoted His crime, "King of the Jews." He was executed for being a political rebel although unproven and untrue. Upon the cross were a thief and another social outcast who were being executed for crimes that today would not anywhere incur execution.
gtg
AnswerIn first-century Palestine, the people did not generally have surnames in the way we now do, although many of the Romans did. Jews were simply known as the son ('bar') of their father.
To a large degree, the ancient Romans borrowed much of Hellenistic culture from the ancient Greeks.
I personally think that it was a negative rule, because the Etruscans were mean and nasty and didn't give the Romans much freedom at all. You can think of it like when you get grounded, you aren't allowed to do much of anything. It's kind of like that, but with the Romans. :)
Judas Iscariot was an Apostle, and the Romans knew where to find Jesus because of Judas.
In the garden of Gethsemane Judas said nothing to Jesus, but had told the guards that the man that he kisses on the cheek is to be arressted. Jesus replied to Judas after the kiss, "You betray the Son of Man with a kiss?"
Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.Jesus himself had little or no impact on the Romans. He had very little contact with them in his lifetime. In fact, the Romans did not even know who he was, as they had to have someone (Judas) point him out before they could arrest him. It was the followers of Jesus who carried his message to Rome.
At the time that Jesus lived, the Romans hardly knew who he was. (At the betrayal, they had to have someone, Judas, point him out to them) There was only one or two who had any contact with him during his ministry, so the Romans in general, had no opinion of him.
Judas- he betrayed him with a kiss on the cheek.(Mark 14:43-46)(Luke 22:47+48)
The Bible says that Judas betrayed Jesus to the Romans. However recently a gospel of Judas was discovered that says Jesus told Judas to do it even though Judas didn't want to. Most Biblical scholars don't believe the gospel of Judas but, some do. So, it really comes down to whether we choose to accept the Gospel not included in the Bible or not. Personally I don't know. Several books and gospels were not included by the council of nicea in ancient Rome so it is possible that Judas did have a gospel that simply was not included.
Rodolphe Kasser has written: 'El Evangelio De Judas' 'Yverdon' -- subject(s): Celtic Antiquities, Celts, History, Roman Antiquities, Romans 'L' e vangile selon Thomas' -- subject(s): Criticism, interpretation, Gospel of Thomas 'Kellia' -- subject(s): Cellia (Monastery) 'The Gospel of Judas' -- subject(s): Gospel of Judas, Evangelie van Judas, Apocriefen, Gnosticisme, Evangelium des Judas, History 'Coptology'
30 pieces of silver
In their first conversation they discussed how much the priests would pay for Judas to betray Jesus. In their meeting after the betrayal, Judas realized that he had given Jesus up to be killed and gave the money back. Judas then went out and hung himself.
-----------------------Judas Iscariot was a Jew, and it most unusual for a Jew of the first century to have a surname (Iscariot), although it was common among Romans and Greeks.John Shelby Spong (Jesus for the NonReligious) points out that Judas is a variant of Judah, highlighting that the man who betrayed Jesus was a Jew. Iscariot seems to be based on sicarii, a Latin word for 'assassin'. Spong believes the character Judas Iscariot is probably a literary creation.
A:According to the gospels, Judas Iscariot was one of the disciples of Jesus. Jews were universally known by their father's name, and it would have been normal for any Jew to be known (in Aramaic) as Joseph son of Heli, or the like. It was certainly the practice of Romans and Greeks to have surnames, but almost unheard of for a Jew to have a surname, and Judas was a Jew.Some scholars have cast doubt on the historicity of Judas Iscariot. John Shelby Spong (Jesus for the NonReligious) says that the name Iscariot seems to be based on sicarii, a Latin term for 'assassins'. It seems too much of a coincidence that the traitor Judas should (alone among the apostles) have a surname, and that surname could provide a clue as to his future actions.
30 pieces of sliver and Judas betrayed him