Want this question answered?
no
yes
Neither, spend more money on real health care for people. People are more important than any of those explorations.
We should spend a minimum amount on space exploration, mainly using unmanned vehicles. We (the USA) can not afford to spend too much, because we are trillions of dollars in debt and there are too many more important programs that need the money more than space.A historically informed perspective:One of the periods of greatest technological and economic advancement in the history of the US was between 1962 to 1972. This period of time coincides with the Gemini and Apollo programs. The US space program produced advancements in science across nearly all disciplines, many leading to improvements in the US economy and standard of living. It can only be surmised that continued, possibly even increased emphasis on space exploration would produce similar results today. To end a potential solution to huge problems in society because of those very same huge problems in society is incredibly foolish and short sighted.
Yuri Gagarin was in space for 1hr 48mins.
no
Ocean Eploration
yes
Neither, spend more money on real health care for people. People are more important than any of those explorations.
5 cents because they are too cheap and they use it to bomb Hitler.
5 cents because they are too cheap and they use it to bomb Hitler.
Astronauts spend 6 months in space with out there familys or there kids but they do get a lot of money
Because of the vast area over which the population of Canada lives a large quantity of taxes go towards maintainin and constructing roads and related infrustructure. This leaves less money to spend on things like space exploration. This being said Canada has a space agency which sends people to space via NASA. Canada also supplies the Canada Arm which is a main component of the international space staion and NASA space craft. The Canada arm is used to perform extra vehicular activities to reduce workload of the crews. The Canada arm is privately owned and is not the product of the Canadian government.
We should spend a minimum amount on space exploration, mainly using unmanned vehicles. We (the USA) can not afford to spend too much, because we are trillions of dollars in debt and there are too many more important programs that need the money more than space.A historically informed perspective:One of the periods of greatest technological and economic advancement in the history of the US was between 1962 to 1972. This period of time coincides with the Gemini and Apollo programs. The US space program produced advancements in science across nearly all disciplines, many leading to improvements in the US economy and standard of living. It can only be surmised that continued, possibly even increased emphasis on space exploration would produce similar results today. To end a potential solution to huge problems in society because of those very same huge problems in society is incredibly foolish and short sighted.
An appropriations bill.
my answer is pep
The United States must spend more money on space exploration.