Want this question answered?
Land meant grain which could be sold for money.
citystate
It is not a state (nation) but a geographic region. The word Mesopotamia comes from the Greek meaning 'between the rivers'. It refers to the region between the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers.
City-states formed in Mesopotamia and Greece due to factors such as geography, fertile land, and trade opportunities. The presence of rivers like the Tigris and Euphrates in Mesopotamia and the rugged terrain of Greece made it easier for communities to settle in distinct areas and develop independently. In contrast, India and China had vast landmasses and geographical features that promoted the development of larger, centralized states rather than city-states. Additionally, cultural and political factors unique to India and China also influenced their historical trajectories.
It is Sargon, a soldier from a powerful city and state in northern Mesopotamia, created the first empire in the world and the area of the ancient mesopotamia.
No it was not. It was a large part of land that housed many different city-states. :)
Land meant grain which could be sold for money.
Land meant grain which could be sold for money.
i think that it is because they both had unflat land that unallowed them to grow crops
citystate
i think that it is because they both had unflat land that unallowed them to grow crops
to gain land for farming, and proberally over resources, such as water, food, ext.
Ur was located in Mesopotamia - modern day Iraq .
City-states
It is not a state (nation) but a geographic region. The word Mesopotamia comes from the Greek meaning 'between the rivers'. It refers to the region between the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers.
City-states formed in Mesopotamia and Greece due to factors such as geography, fertile land, and trade opportunities. The presence of rivers like the Tigris and Euphrates in Mesopotamia and the rugged terrain of Greece made it easier for communities to settle in distinct areas and develop independently. In contrast, India and China had vast landmasses and geographical features that promoted the development of larger, centralized states rather than city-states. Additionally, cultural and political factors unique to India and China also influenced their historical trajectories.
weak empire Mesopotamia had a weak empireReality:The fact that city-states are mentioned makes it plain that there was no empire - city-states are what they say - independent states based on a city, and so could not be an 'empire' which connotes centralised rule. And it was this independent status which led them to fighting between themselves. Mesopotamian civilisation was dependent on land and water. Disputed over them drove wars of possession.