The runway would require relatively little, because it would be a short runway for regional aircraft - but the buildings, roads etcetera would requre the demolition of three villages to the north of LHR and the forced relocation of numerous businesses.
No, but they will require a much longer runway if they plan to land without thrust reversers.
No, not really. The only real way a airport could land any aircraft would be to have a 4 mile or longer runway. However, the problem for most aircraft is not as much landing as much as taking off, which could require a 30% longer runway.
About a mile, yeah, a mile.
How much land will require to open a Inter college in uttar pradesh
Cessna is a small plane and it has less speed also. So 1 km is enough to land.
How much land will require to open a Inter college in uttar pradesh
one inch
No. Heathrow is much busier than Frankfurt airport.
because you walk up and down the runway doing all sorts of pose. i am improving this answer. the answer above mine is stupid. it clearly says the category is in airports. okay, so if a runway is active it is used for takeoffs and landings. (not much of an answer though)
There are no trains running between Heathrow and Brighton.
The standard runway length for planning purposes is about 10,000 ft
About the same amount of land as a horse requires anywhere else in the world.