In some countries, the king technically owned the entire country, with the possible exception of lands owned by the Church. Lords, knights, and country gentlemen all held their lands either directly or indirectly from the king, in exchange for support and promises of loyalty.
In some other countries, the kings controlled nearly nothing, or their might not have been a king at all. King Childeric III of the Franks might have owned something, in terms of legalities, but he had no power at all and could not even decide his own fate. Venice, on the other hand, was founded as a republic, and never had a king.
None. The nobles and everyone in the social levels below them in the Feudal system only held land, they did not own it - it was the king and the Church who owned all the land.
In return for their land holdings, nobles owed military service to the king.
It varied according to time and place. In some places and times, it owned very little. I have read that in England, at its height it owned about a third of all property.
What were the land marks in church history
They gave away land
During the early middle ages, 500 - 1000AD, Europe was a frontier land as it was sparsely populated and undeveloped. ;P
A person who lived in the Middle Ages is called medieval.
A Serf
England
peasants
A king (or lord) ruled large areas of land. To protect his land from invasion, the king gave parts of it to local lords, who were called vassals.
The Holy Roman Empire.
Peasants during the Middle Ages could only earn freedom by saving money to buy land.
During the middle ages serfs worked for their lords and that is who protected them.
The Latin name for the land that was given to the vassal by the king or a lord in the middle Ages (during feudalism).