0
What else can I help you with?
What might a Roman Emperor say about the Senate?
By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.
What might the Roman emperor say about the senate?
By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.By the time that Rome had the emperors, the senate was nothing more than a rubber stamp for the emperor's wishes. Debate was allowed but the outcome was never in doubt. Many of the emperors used the senate as a tool for justifying their own plans. Caligula had so little respect for the senate that he claimed his horse could do a better job than the consuls.
Limit on the debate of a bill in the senate?
If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is part of the majority, he or she gets to write the _______.
What is a fillerbuster?
A Filibuster is term used for an extended debate in the Senate which prevents a vote by wasting time.
What is a cloture?
A procedure used in the senate to limit debate on a bill
What is the difference between an impromptu debate and an extemporaneous debate?
The answer is: B: In an impromptu debate, participants have much less time to prepare for the debate than in an extemporaneous debate.
What main differences exist between the house and the senate in the lawmaking process?
All revenue bills must start in the House of Representatives. Represenatives do not have unlimited time to talk on the floor. They can be over-looked or given a time limit by the rules of the House of the Speaker of the House. Senators have no time limits and may talk indefinately unless there is a cloture vote in which other members of the Senate vote to halt discussions of the current item before the Senate.
How much time do senators usually have to debate a bill on the floor of the senate?
The Senate does not have a time limit. The only real time limit for the Senate is that they have to vote on the bill before that Congressional session ends. If the session ends before the bill is sent to the President's desk, for any reason whatsoever (no matter how trivial the reason is), then the bill "dies," and they have to start all over the next January (when the next session begins). This often leads to abuse, which is called a "filibuster," where one Senator who opposes a bill will attempt to just talk endlessly until the bill is withdrawn, or the session ends. To combat a filibuster, 3/5 of the Senate (currently, sixty Senators) can invoke a "cloture," which limits a bill to one hour of debate. This is the only time the Senate has a time limit other than the Congressional session.
The number of Senators would change if what occurred?
The changes occurred through Senate Resolution 15 and Senate ... In the new rules, the amount of time to debate following a motion to ... Additionally, a filibuster on the motion to proceed will be blocked.
What is the alternate channel of Wheel of Fortune while the senate debate is on?
It's unlikely there is an alternate channel sometimes when a show it preempted they show it at a later time
Explain how and why the rules for debate in the House are more restrictive than those of the Senate?
The rules of debate are more restrictive in the House of Representatives because there are more members therefore time limits must be imposed to effectively manage and make decisions. If there were no time limits on debates it could bring about a standstill.
Did the Romans believe that all citizens were equal under the law?
Roman women had rights just about equal to men, but they still lived in a male dominated world. For example, a woman could not vote or run for public office. A woman, although she had the right to divorce, still had to have a male relative or guardian make the arrangements. A woman could only inherit a minimal amount from her husband or father. A woman could not join the army. Despite these restrictions, the Roman women had more equality with men than many of their ancient counterparts.
