As they had an accord, they would both chuck a cord.
The tongue twister has no meaning. Groundhogs or woodchucks do not "chuck" or throw anything, except when they dig in the dirt. The dirt is thrown out on both sides of their body, since a groundhog has short legs and is low to the ground.
Woodchucks are considerably larger than both squirrels and mice. Woodchucks live in holes in the ground, mice in nests at various levels and squirrels in trees. Woodchucks, like squirrels, limit their activity in the winter.
Chuck Norris. Goku would kill chuck Norris and then Kratos would appear revive chuck Norris and double both of their abilities then fight them but it wouldn't actually be a fight because Kratos would annihalate them within 72 seconds.
If they were both still in there prime Chuck would be it no prob, but Forrest has youth on his side. But still I think Chuck is a better fighter
Distantly, in that they're both mammals. However, biologists group them in different orders: beavers are Rodentia; otters are Carnivora. Otters are actually more closely related to weasels and badgers than they are to beavers.
In terms of recognizing these animals by sight, woodchucks dwell primarily on land and have small stubby tails, whereas muskrats, which are smaller than woodchucks, have long, rat-like tails and spend most of their time in the water.
The woodchuck has more characteristics in common with squirrels because they are from the same family
Neither, they would both simultaneously lose to Michael Lowe.
Nolan Key Bushnell, founded both Atari and Chuck E Cheese.
answer
In terms of existance, Chuck Norris would win. You cannot have a fight between a real person and a fictional person. Daniel Day Lewis would defeat them both. And Candle Jack, if he showed up, would
Well first is why? if you found both, just let them go. The probably get along fine, neither is an aggressive animal.