well first off i must say unless you have an awful Carb , i would stay with a carb instead of fuel unjection but it does have its benefits as far as a quicker response and ext. but as far as pricing goes its a wide variety really i mean what size cfm? multi port? i know an old Iroc would work, if i had to take a shot at it i would say around $1500 theres a place called Painless and they have a Painless wiring kit you can buy its really great , its not alot of work if you know what your doing but there is alittle bit and of course it has its pros and cons.
No carburetor on that 89 S10. It would be throttle body fuel injected.
Yes it has a carburetor. An engine with fuel injection would be a fuel injected engine.
The Ford Explorer engines are fuel injected , so no carburetor
depends...does it have a carburetor or fuel injected..?
If I am not mistaken, all 2007 Harley Davidson's were fuel injected and would not have a carburetor.
It would be very expensive considering that car doesn't have a carburetor.
I own a 1992 ford ranger, 300c.i. v-6 and it is fuel injected.
A 1994 van would be fuel injected not carbureted.
On fuel injected vehicles like your Honda the throttlebody would replace a carb
The 1989 Cavalier is Fuel Injected and does not have a carburetor. The 2.8 V6 is Multi Port FI. The 4 cylinder, I am not familiar with and it may be Throttle Body FI which would look like a carburetor, but if you look closely, has a single injector mounted in the intake plenum. Both engines are FI.
It doesn't have a carburator. It has a throttle body fuel injection and a faulty fuel pump would be my first guess. This most likely has the 4.3 Vortec total fuel injected not the TBI
There is no reason you would have to.