Generally speaking the nominations of US presidents are rarely rejected. This means that although the candidates may lean toward a particular philosophy of a president, they are on the whole considered to be fair when it comes to decisions regarding the US Constitution.
By appointing Article III federal judges to the Judicial Branch, and by granting pardons (may not grant a pardon for an impeachment).
The president tries to choose nominees who agree with his political and judicial philosophy. However, he also has to pick people the Senate will confirm.
Strict constructionism is a judicial philosophy that interprets the Constitution based on its original intent and text, strictly adhering to the literal meaning of the words within it. Judges following this philosophy typically do not incorporate contemporary values or societal changes in their interpretations.
It can declare the presidents actions unconstitutional.
By taking policy making, the court asserted a type of judicial philosophy known as judicial review.
the executive,the legislative,and the judicial
refers to a particular legal philosophy of judicial interpretation that limits or restricts judicial interpretation.
Legal philosophy of judicial interpretation.
1. appointing new judges who in principle have philosophies consistent with the president.2. limiting the jurisdiction of the federal courts with an executive order.3. forcing Congress to consider impeachment of specific judges.4. declaring martial law, which restricts judicial decision-making.
Appointing judges refers to the process by which judges are selected for judicial positions, typically by a government authority or elected official. In many countries, this process involves nominations by the executive branch, often requiring confirmation by the legislative branch. The criteria and procedures for appointing judges can vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction and legal system, influencing the independence and accountability of the judiciary. Ultimately, the aim is to ensure that qualified individuals serve in the judicial system to uphold the rule of law.
Legislative checks Executive by Overriding vetos and checks Judicial by Appointing Judges.Executive checks Judicial by Appointing Judges and checks Legislative by Vetoing Laws.Judicial checks Legislative by deciding if the laws are unconstitutional and checks Executive by deciding if the president's actions are unconstitutional.Hope this helped! :)
The Dred Scott decision and a philosophy of judicial restraint