0
How often have the result of the electoral college differed from the popular vote?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
It has occurred 3 times: in 1986 with Hayes vs Tilden (Hayes won), 1888 with Harrison and Cleveland (Harrison won), and most recently in 2000 where Bush beat Gore.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoonce
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which constitutional changes was a result of party practices?
The electoral college becoming a 'rubber stamp' for the popular vote was a constitutional change as the result of party practices. A candidate must receive 270 electoral votes to become president.
What are the informal amendments a result of?
The constitutional change that deals with the use of the electoral college as a rubber stamp for the popular vote was a result of party practices. The founding fathers were against this idea.
What has most dramatically reshaped the electoral college from it's intended purpose out of the political parties the cabinet the senate or the court decisions?
Court decisions have had the most dramatic impact on reshaping the Electoral College from its intended purpose. One significant decision was the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Bush v. Gore in 2000, which ultimately decided the outcome of the presidential election. This decision solidified the notion that the Electoral College, rather than the popular vote, determines the winner of the presidency, thus further shaping the role and influence of the Electoral College in contemporary elections.
Which amendment makes it possible that a president candidate can lose the popular vote but still win the electoral vote and the election?
The amendment in question is not responsible for allowing a presidential candidate to lose the popular vote but win the electoral vote. This is a consequence of the design of the Electoral College, outlined in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. The Electoral College system can result in a discrepancy between the popular vote and the electoral vote, as it is the latter that ultimately determines the outcome of the presidential election.
Why might electing a president with a minority vote be more controversial under a popular vote system than under the Electoral college system?
In order to win in the electoral college, a majority is required. There is no such thing as a minority winner there. If no one gets a majority, the House of Representatives elects the President from the three top vote-getters. Every state gets one vote. If they choose a candidate with a minority of the votes, the result would probably be just as controversial as when a person with a plurality of popular votes loses in the electoral college.
How is it possible for the electoral vote to produce a different result from the popular vote?
That happens because the electoral votes are not given in the same proportions as the popular votes received. Virtually every state uses the "winner-takes-all" method of appointing electors. If, for example, 48% of a state's popular votes are cast in favor of Candidate A, 47% support Candidate B, and 5% support Candidate C, Candidate A gets 100% of that state's electoral votes and Candidates B & C don't get any.The Electoral College casts the electoral votes. It is comprised of representatives of each state. While the popular vote is held to have an impact on the Electoral College's decisions on who to vote for, it is not illegal for the Electoral College to vote another way. In addition, not every state has the same amount of electoral votes. It is possible for more people total to vote for a president, but since they are so spread throughout the states, the Electoral Votes may end in another way.
Individual casting electoral vote for president?
In the United States, individual casting of electoral votes for president occurs when members of the Electoral College cast their votes for the presidential candidate that won their state's popular vote. Each elector has the discretion to vote for the candidate of their choice. However, some states have laws that require electors to vote according to the popular vote result in their state.
What was Stephen Douglas electoral voting result?
Stephen Douglas won only 12 electoral voting (Missouri and a part of New Jersey) and 849,781 popular votes.
Do we even need an electoral college anymore?
The need for the electoral college is debatable. Supporters argue that it balances power between densely populated and less populated states, ensuring fair representation for all. Opponents argue that it can result in the winner of the popular vote not winning the presidency, undermining the democratic principle of one person, one vote. Ultimately, a thorough examination of its merits and drawbacks is necessary to determine its continued necessity.
What amendment passed as a result of the tie?
The 12th amendment was added as a result of the tie in the electoral college between Thomas Jefferson and his running mate Aaron Burr in 1800.
When did the electoral college vote against the majority?
The most recent case of this was in 2000, when Democrat Al Gore received the most popular votes (regardless of whether the final result in Florida was correct or not), but Republican George W. Bush won the Electoral College vote. This is an odd case since the US Supreme Court intervened in a dispute over who legitimately won Florida's electoral votes; the Court ruled that the votes could not be recounted to confirm the result. Bush was leading in Florida prior to the recount and therefore received Florida's votes, but if the recount had been completed and if it had resulted in Gore winning Florida (whether this would have happened is unknown), then Gore would have won the Electoral College as well as the popular vote. The Electoral vote as not agreed with the popular vote in three other instances. These occurred in 1824, 1876, and 1888.
What events occurred during the 2000 presidential election?
The winner of the popular vote lost the election. The most unusual aspect was the involvement of the Florida Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court in the adjudication of irregular votes that could have changed the result of the election.
