Pressure groups and movements exert influence on politics in a variety of ways:
(i) They try to gain public support and sympathy for their goals and their activity by carrying out information campaigns, organizing meetings, file petitions, etc. Most of these groups try to influence the media into giving attention to these issues.
(ii) They often organised protests like strikes or disrupting programs. Workers' organisation, employees associations and most of the movement groups often resort to these tactics in order to force the government to take note of their demand.
(iii) Some persons from pressure groups or movement groups may participate in official bodies and committees that offer advice to the government.
Pressure groups can try to influence government policies by holding public demonstrations, signing written petitions for a specific cause and by electing officials who have the same political idea of certain pressure groups.
Pressure groups influence government decisions.
Pressure groups are the organisations or the groups that attempt to influence government policies.
demonstrate
A pressure group is an organization whose members seek to influence the policies of public bodies or employers.
They don't. People will continue to eat whatever they want to.
The objective of political parties is to attain power and form the government, whereas the aim of pressure groups is only to influence the decision-making of the government
Lobbying When interest groups take actions to influence congress and congressional votes, this is called "lobbying," and the persons who engage in these activities on behalf of the interest groups are called "lobbyists." The terms "lobby," "lobbying" and "lobbyists" originate from the UK's Parliament. Persons who wanted to speak with any member of parliament, such as to ask for votes on particular issues, would wait in the hallways (or "lobbies") of parliamentary buildings to meet them.
consumer interest groups, professional associations, and self-regulatory groups exert considerable influence on marketing.
It could be argued that pressure groups have become more important in recent years. Membership to pressure groups, and the amount of them, has increased significantly. This has occured at a time where party membership has declined. Another increase in activity has been seen with the advent of the human rights act, which allowed the campaign group liberty to exert a high degree of influence. In the modern era, it is easier for pressure groups to broadcast their aims to the eneral public. They can therefore gain support quickly via cyberactivism, and co-ordinate protests easily on national and international scales. Supportin this is the fact that over 95% of pressure groups have a website. Politicians have often recognised the importance of outsider pressure groups, and sided with them for personal gain. Hazel Blears, for example, sided with a group tryin to ensure her local maternity unit remained open, whilst simultaneously supporting the government that tried to close it. On the contrary, despite the increase in membership, pressure groups fail to wield any more power than they have in the past. The anti war demonstrators failed to influence parliament despite their large size. The recent success of the Gurkha Justice Campaign achieved its aims only with extremely significant support, such as high public sympathy, a high profile celebrity and an extensive media campaign. Furthermore, insider pressure groups continue to dominate influence on policy. Groups which are practically unheard of such as The Howard League have insider status despite a low membership. Minorities are seldom represented, as they are usually silenced under the weight of large, wealthy groups like the CBI. Overall, there are a balanced rane of arguments to suggest that whilst pressure groups have become more popular, their importance and ability to influence policy has remained stagnant.
The type of power that special interest groups have is founded on influence and pressure by the citizens. The citizens of any democratic nations serve as the main source power which is what special interest groups rely on.
It can be argued that pressure groups are undemocratic, and bad for democracy, in many ways. One reason why they can be viewed as being bad for democracy is because they are generally undemocratic in organisation. This means that they have no real authority with which to fight their cause, since they are unelected. The membership of pressure groups is also generally from the middle classes and so is not representative of the population. Another reason for why pressure groups could be bad for democracy is that there is unequal distribution of resources between groups, and unequal influence between different groups. This means that groups with more money will be more likely to be successful, because they are better able to promote their cause. Some powerful insider pressure groups could remove power from democratically elected governments as they attempt to pursue their own personal cause. Pressure groups also sometimes have unrealistic aims and this can lead the electorate to feel that the government are not handling situations correctly. Certain outsider pressure groups may choose to opperate illegally and so can undermine and attack the government, and so attack the political and democratic authority which the government posseses.
The Federal governmentÊÊreceives pressure from labor union attempting to influence policy. Interest groups are form of labor unions who boycotts government on their policies.