By proving that walking under a ladder will not make bad things happen to you, it may be stupidly risky if someone has a tool/bucket/tin of paint and you knock the ladder causing it to hit you but by the scientific process of prediction, testing and conclusion of results we get proof that some superstitions are wrong.
Definitely not.
Scientifically, superstitions are considered as a psychological need for supernatural belief
While there are certainly historical, anthropological and cultural reasons behind most superstitions, they are called superstitions because of the very fact that they have no basis in Science.
There is nothing wrong with it as long it doesn't become the science or replace science.
No. Superstitions are not scientific in any way whatsoever.
By definition, a superstition is an unscientific belief. Science and technology are therefore unable to shake many people's superstitions. Lack of understanding of science and technology has led to the development of new superstitions, such as the belief that Mercury retrograde can cause your computer to malfunction.
Superstitions are not based in science. There might be a logical reason like breaking a mirror is bad luck but does not cause bad luck but this is not scientific.
It would depend greatly on which branch of science you are referring to. Generally, resistance is a force or condition that opposes a change, condition or movement.
ewan nakakaadik na to.HAHA XD :P
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
In electronics/electricity, it's a component or part of a circuit that opposes/reduces the flow of current.
a force that opposes motion between surfaces that are touching