It depends on the institution how superiors and subordinates should interact with each other. In most situations, it would be good to have a mutual respect.
The actual rule is that superiors may address subordinates by their first name. Subordinates must use rank or rank and surname.
Coalition
verbal communication reduces misconducts and distortions in the sense that subordinates carefully understands the information being pronounced by there superiors.
Orientating employees on the policies of business objectives, developing positive relationships among subordinates and superiors, and providing feedback are ways that organizations can overcome barriers to communication. Also, full attention should be used during communication.
* It is wise not to invite 'some' subordinates' lest you hurt others feelings. If you have close friends that are your subordinates then you can invite them to the wedding.
Supervisors and their subordinates should have a relationship that fosters communication. Supervisors should be willing to listen to those who report to them.
Only for direct subordinates at most, such as the vice-president and cabinet secretaries.
360 evaluation is different than traditional evaluation in that an employee is evaluated by more than just his or her superior. In 360 evaluation, an employee may be evaluated by his or her subordinates, customers, peers, and superiors.
The MSAF program, or Multi-Source Assessment and Feedback Program, "provides leaders with personalized and confidential Soldier feedback from superiors, peers, and subordinates online, supporting the recognition of a Soldier's strengths and identification of areas for development. "
The most important reasons are:- Mess understanding between the superiors and subordinates.- failure in equipment's and communication devices.
"My superiors are dunces".
it allows you to train members and associates