He was very successful throughout Europe, conquering practically everything he wanted. He failed in Russia not because of bad strategy, tactics, weapons, or inadequate manpower; but because he was not prepared for the winter there which killed over 99% of his troops before he finally withdrew. He also failed in other areas outside Europe.
No, he was a conqueror.
Napoleon
He was simply following orders.
no, he wasn't he wasn't an explorer, he was a conqueror.
yes
Napoleon or Hitler Surely 'William the Conqueror' - the Norman conqueror of England, who invaded in (wait for it!) AD 1066.
Napoleon Bonaparte
{| |- | Napoleon BonaparteMarie and Pierre CurieGustave EiffelJeanne d'ArcWilliam the Conqueror |}
He was a successful king because he conquered England and invented a feudal system
Cooksonia was the most successful land conqueror and was the first of an entirely new kind of plants that was no longer an alga or bryophyte.
Almost.
In Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, Napoleon Bonaparte was crowned Napoleon I. Pope Pius VII handed Napoleon the crown that the 35-year-old conqueror of Europe placed on his own head.