He was very successful throughout Europe, conquering practically everything he wanted. He failed in Russia not because of bad strategy, tactics, weapons, or inadequate manpower; but because he was not prepared for the winter there which killed over 99% of his troops before he finally withdrew. He also failed in other areas outside Europe.
No, he was a conqueror.
Napoleon
He was simply following orders.
no, he wasn't he wasn't an explorer, he was a conqueror.
yes
Napoleon or Hitler Surely 'William the Conqueror' - the Norman conqueror of England, who invaded in (wait for it!) AD 1066.
Napoleon Bonaparte
He was a successful king because he conquered England and invented a feudal system
{| |- | Napoleon BonaparteMarie and Pierre CurieGustave EiffelJeanne d'ArcWilliam the Conqueror |}
Almost.
Cooksonia was the most successful land conqueror and was the first of an entirely new kind of plants that was no longer an alga or bryophyte.
France