The Speenhamland system was not successful as the overseers were not payed and so some turned corrupt and took money that was supposed to go to the poor, the Speenhamland system was one of the woThe overseers were not payed and so some turnes corrupt and took money that was supposed to go to the poor, the speenhamland system was one of the worst things within the poor law because the price of bread would go up because the farmers need to pay tax meaning that more money would have to be given to the poor to buy bread increasing the tax by a lot returning to the problem with the farmer paying taxes and happening all over again.the speenhamland system encouraged idolness as if you didnt have enough money to buy the bread you would get a top up, this also implied cheap labour meaning that if you were paying a poor person you could pay them what you want knowing that they will get a top up and still be able to buy bread. Because this system was based on the price of bread and the size of your family it encouraged younger marriages and children, growing the population of the poor hence increasing the amount of tax needed to give all those people enough money to buy bread.
Speenhamland system was created in 1795.
The Basic Principals of Successful system is to follow the design of a predefined system..
He was a successful king because he conquered England and invented a feudal system
full unemployment rates
Bureaucracy.
yes
Bureaucracy.
explain what is meant by a 5-1 setting system and explain whyn it could be successful
That is known as a cyber attack. It involves unauthorized access to information systems with the intent of disrupting, stealing, or manipulating data or system operations. Cyber attacks pose significant threats to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information.
The attempted or successful unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification or destruction of information or interference with system operations in an information system is called:
system state data
It is difficult to argue that a philosophical system is 'succesful'. If you define 'sucessful' by the practical application of the system, then marxism seems not very successful, since the countries that adopted a political system based on marxism principles have been disolved.