well it mostly depends on the ways and types
1) the logical approach- in this the things (fossils) you find deeper will be more older than the one found on the surface.
2)the constituent study- the method work by calculating the number of isotopes of an element present in the fossil
3)carbon dating - estimating the number of cabon14 isotope.
no but you can tell the age of the fossil from the age of the rock around it, you cant tell the age of the earth from fossils is because animals with bones were didnt exist until later in the earth's "life"
Too many people to count. This year, Robert Taylor found a nearly complete skeleton of a woolly mammoth in Siberia. There a lot of them who discovered fossils of ice age animals. These people are called paleontologists.
Index fossils
dont care
The discovery of a fossil's age can be determined through methods involving radiometric dating. Fossils must then be compared to other organisms of that time period to determine changes to it.
The age of a plant or animal in a fossil is determined by radiocarbon dating. This means scientists measure the amount of a special type of carbon in the fossil, to determine the date.
No. radio carbon dating is only efficient for the fossils of plants or animals. As pottery is an abiotic substance its age cannot be determined by carbon dating
Through Radioactive Dating or Isotopic Dating.
Radiometric dating of fossils is not possible beyond roughly 70,000 years. However, when fossils are found in association with strata of volcanic and metamorphic rocks which can be dated radiometrically, a very accurate age of the fossils can be determined.
Index fossils can be used to help determine the relative age of rock layers. Index fossils are from species that only existed for a short time. Index fossils are found in rock layers. Trilobites and Graptolites are index fossils.
no but you can tell the age of the fossil from the age of the rock around it, you cant tell the age of the earth from fossils is because animals with bones were didnt exist until later in the earth's "life"
It is determined because in layers of rocks the fossils are found so the layers of rocks give information to the scientist about the age of a fossil so like that the relative age of a fossil is determined.
By definition, we could say all three fossils are 'ancient'. Fossils provide an ancient record of plants and animals.
Too many people to count. This year, Robert Taylor found a nearly complete skeleton of a woolly mammoth in Siberia. There a lot of them who discovered fossils of ice age animals. These people are called paleontologists.
No. radio carbon dating is only efficient for the fossils of plants or animals. As pottery is an abiotic substance its age cannot be determined by carbon dating
because, unlike groups of fossils in most sedimentary rocks, the asphalt traps provide a reliable record of animal and plant communities living in one place. --A
No, fossils are the remaining traces of a plant or animal matter that existed in a past geological age. Physics is the study of all aspects of the interactions between energy and matter.