Want this question answered?
no i hate when people just say no
Get a bigger telescope. Resolution is proportional to the size of the telescope. But due to the atmosphere, there is a practical limit beyond which it makes no difference what the telescope size is.
I hate how this question comes up on google with no answer
much larger.slightly larger.in space. Correct answer is MUCH LARGER. ;-)
150
The angular size of the smallest features that the telescope can see ;-)
the lens and eye piece
Optical
no i hate when people just say no
Get a bigger telescope. Resolution is proportional to the size of the telescope. But due to the atmosphere, there is a practical limit beyond which it makes no difference what the telescope size is.
I hate how this question comes up on google with no answer
It allows two or more smaller telescopes to achieve angular resolution of a much larger telescope.
much larger.slightly larger.in space. Correct answer is MUCH LARGER. ;-)
150
a light-collecting area equivalent to that of a much larger telescope.an angular resolution equivalent to that of a much larger telescope.both the light-collecting area and angular resolution of a much larger telescope.Correct answer: an anguar resolution equivalent to that of a much larger telescope. ;-)
For telescopes of the same size: if the wavelength gets longer, the maximum theoretical angular resolution gets larger (i.e., worse).
The resolution of a telescope is the telescope's ability to determine if two points are seen as two points or one smudgy point. Resolution, or resolving power is measured as an angle below which differentiation cannot be made. The resolution of a telescope is a consequence of the wave nature of light. Because waves can add to each other, or cancel each other, in a process called diffraction, the aperature of the telescope must be as large as possible compared to the distance to the objects and the wavelength of the light to give the best performance. An equation which describes the resolution of a telescope is