because they wouldn't trade but it was still allowed to have slaves
Because they considered slavery and slave trade essential to their economies.
The projected total number of slaves taken in the Triangular trade during the 1800's till the ending of slavery in America is estimated at 10 million persons.
because sadly it still is
The civil war was fought because of slavery. North=No Slavery South=More Slavery
First. some of the northern states were also slave states. Second, much of the slave trade and slave ships were operated by Northerners. Finally, the north purchased tobacco and cotton that were produced by slave labor.
Abolitionists
Abolitionists believed that the first step to ending slavery was to stop the expansion of slavery into new territories and states. They sought to prevent it from spreading further and to ultimately abolish it entirely.
Rather a vague question. Perhaps you mean the ending of the slave trade and then the abolition of slavery.
They feared that the Southern economy would be ruined if slavery was outlawed.
called for the ending of the slave trade in 1808.
Slave trade in Britain was outlawed in 1808 when Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act of 1807. However, this did not slavery altogether. The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 abolished slavery in most British Empires.
The biggest difference was ending slavery. Europeans seemed to be interested in slave trade but they caused it to end after their arrival in to the African way of life
The 1807 Slave Trade Act was a law passed by the British Parliament that abolished the transatlantic slave trade. It made it illegal to engage in the business of trading enslaved people between Africa, the Americas, and the Caribbean. The act was a significant step towards the eventual abolition of slavery in the British Empire.
Slaves generally felt dehumanized, exploited, and oppressed by the slave trade. They experienced loss of freedom, family separation, physical abuse, and harsh living conditions. The trauma and lasting impact of the slave trade are profound and continue to affect descendants today.
No. Slavery and the slave trade had been going on in Africa for centuries before the Atlantic Slave trade came into being.
J. A. Richardson has written: 'Slavery and Augustan literature' -- subject(s): English literature, History, History and criticism, Influence, Political and social views, Slave trade, Slave trade in literature, Slave-trade, Slavery, Slavery in literature
HE ABOLISHED SLAVERY