answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Paternalism justified control over dependent groups by viewing them as needing guidance, while social Darwinism applied evolutionary ideas to justify inequalities among individuals or groups in society. Both ideologies reinforced power imbalances and justified hierarchical social structures.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How was policy of paternalism like social Darwinism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

Was social darwinism studied by Emile Durkheim?

No, Emile Durkheim did not specifically study social Darwinism. He is known for his work in sociology, focusing on topics such as social integration, religion, and suicide. Social Darwinism was a theory that applied Darwin's principles of natural selection to society, which was more commonly associated with thinkers like Herbert Spencer.


Why did business leaders like the idea of social darwinism?

Business leaders supported social Darwinism because it justified their accumulation of wealth and power as a natural result of their superiority in society. It provided a rationale for their success and allowed them to reject government intervention in economic matters. Ultimately, social Darwinism reinforced the idea of survival of the fittest as a driving force in business and society.


How did social Darwinism affect World War 2?

Social Darwinism did not directly cause World War II, but it did contribute to ideologies like fascism and Naziism that played a significant role in the war. These ideologies promoted the idea of survival of the fittest and superiority of certain races, leading to policies of aggression, expansion, and genocide. In this way, social Darwinism indirectly influenced the events and outcomes of World War II.


What was social drownism?

It sounds like you may be referring to "social Darwinism," a belief that individuals, groups, and societies are subject to the same laws of natural selection as plants and animals. Proponents of social Darwinism used this idea to justify inequality, discrimination, and exploitation, arguing that it was "natural" for some groups to dominate others.


What belif social drawnisim?

It seems like there may be a typo in your question. If you are referring to beliefs around social darwinism, it is a flawed social theory that has been widely discredited. Social darwinism suggested that certain social groups or individuals are more fit or superior based on natural selection, which has been used to justify discrimination and inequality. It is not grounded in valid scientific principles and should be approached critically.

Related questions

What is social darwinism-?

Social Darwinism is a belief that individuals and societies follow the same biological laws of natural selection as plants and animals. It suggests that the strongest and most capable individuals or groups will thrive and succeed, while those who are weaker or less capable will inevitably struggle and face failure. This concept has been used to justify social inequalities, discrimination, and eugenics.


What do social darwinism and white man's burden have in common?

Both ideas sought to justify imperialism and colonialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Social Darwinism argued that only the fittest societies would survive, legitimizing the dominance of Western empires. The White Man's Burden similarly justified Western colonization as a moral duty to civilize and uplift non-Western societies.


What does the theory of Social Darwinism inism advocate?

Social Darwinism is a belief that individuals or groups within a society will compete with each other and that the strongest or most capable will thrive, while the weak will be left behind. It is often used to justify policies and practices that promote competition and individual success over collective well-being.


What was social Darwinism and how was it used during the American Revolution?

Social Darwinism was a belief that certain groups or individuals are destined to survive and succeed due to their superior traits. During the American Revolution, Social Darwinism was not a concept being used as it emerged in the 19th century, long after the revolution. It was primarily influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and applied to justify various socio-political ideologies.


Describe 4 possible influences on the making of social policy in relation to an instance of social concern how they might affect policy making?

Social policy deals with social issues like health, education, housing, food, environment, etc. Social policy is influenced by the needs of the people like poverty, old age, disability, etc. Social policy is a part of public policy and effective policy making helps the people in the economy.


What is the role of policy?

Social policy is much like a social contract. It is the general principles under which a nation's laws guide them to do. For example, social policy or the social contract in our democracy is to respect the police.


Explain the philosophy of social Darwinism?

Social Darwinism is a belief that the principles of natural selection and survival of the fittest should be applied to human societies. It suggests that individuals and groups succeed or fail based on their inherent traits, with little regard for social welfare or equality. This philosophy has been criticized for justifying inequality, imperialism, and prejudice.


How is paternalism best defined?

Legal paternalism is when the laws protect you from harming yourself. Seatbelt laws are an example of legal paternalism. You don't hurt anyone else by not wearing one, just yourself. It is kind of like the government being your mom and dad.


What was social Darwinism and how it affected people's views on imperialism?

Social Darwinism i like the evolution of humans. It states that the most fittest will continue to survive and reproduce, like survival of the fittest. I guess the effect of it on imperialism is that people want to be on top so they tried to conquer all they could to get all the valuables in those places they've conquered and so they can be the fittest.


What is the goal of social policy?

The American Social Policy is a set of guidelines that affect living conditions and human welfare. The American Social Policy includes things like abortion and gay rights.


What are ethical implications?

It means the morality implied by something, like how the right to privacy is implied by the Constitution. Or the moral(s) that aren't specifically stated by something. For example, the ethical implications of a policy that encouraged frequent lay-offs would be something harsh, like "survival of the fittest" or worse, like "social Darwinism." Ethical implications is how the possible outcomes of a situation will affect everyone's best interests.


Define social policy?

A policy for dealing with social issues. More elaborate definition: Social policy relates to guidelines for the changing, maintenance or creation of living conditions that are conducive to human welfare. Thus social policy is that part of public policy that has to do with social issues such as public access to social programs. Social policy aims to improve human welfare and to meet human needs for education, health, housing and social security. In an academic environment, social policy refers to the study of the welfare state and the range of responses to social need. In United States politics, social policies are those which regulate and govern human behavior in areas such as sexuality and general morality. Social policies are in contrast to other, more traditional forms of political policy, such as foreign policy and economic policy. Modern-day social policies may deal with the following issues: abortion, and the regulation of its practice the legal status of euthanasia the rules surrounding issues of marriage, divorce, and adoption poverty, welfare, and homelessness and how it is to deal with these issues Social policy may be influenced by religion and the religious beliefs of politicians. Political conservatives as a whole generally favor a more traditionalist approach that favors individual initiative and private enterprise in social policy. Political liberals, on the other hand favor the guarantee of equal rights and entitlements to all people and tend to favor state regulation or insurance to support this.