Mesopotamian civilizations is a generic word covering several civilizations: Sumerian, Babylonian and Assyrian. More or less covering the actual regions of Syria, Iran and Iraq. If you look at a map, you'll notice the close proximity of Mesopotamia and Egypt, separated only by tiny Israel and Jordan (one Israel on that time) and always fighting each other for power and richness. Their cultures are of the same historical times, but with different religious belief, gods, architectures, way of life, dresses, weaponry and machinery etc., but if you look at it closely, it's not so different because Egyptian survival was relying on the Nile fertility and Mesopotamian survival was relying on the Tigris & Euphrates basin fertility, under the same conditions, thus with the same consequences also.
They both were empowered by a river or rivers. They both got floods, which brings a nice layer of silt to plant crops.
they both have irrigation, trade, paytheism beliefe in gods, and temples.
i hope this help everyone!
They both believed in gods the both we're powered though a river
they both built pyramids
yes its just one simple thing you guys are idiots asking questions
'Mesopotamia' is in origin a Greek name (mesos `middle' and 'potamos' - 'river' so `land between the rivers'). The most common ways, people lived in Mesopotamia is farming. The others maybe a fishermen since Mesopotamia is a land between rivers.
The people of Sumeria, and the people of "KEMET" or Egypt if you will are the same people,and migrated across into Sumeria. If not than the mother land of all life is not in the land we know as "AFRICA"
Both had autocratic rulers who ruled partly through appointed local Governors. Only, Mesopotamian cities were much more independent than those of Egypt and were practically City-States. The central ruler ("King" in Mesopotamia, "Pharaoh" in Egypt) was in theory all-powerful in both States, but in Mesopotamia his actual power depended on the force and personality of individual kings, much more so than in Egypt. Both rulers were seen as descendants from the Gods, but the Pharaohs were seen as gods themselves, the Mesopotamian kings on the other hand had 'human' status. All in all, the differences between the political systems were probably greater than the similarities.
The Roman and Helinistic civilizations were similar because they both spread their cultures throughout their part of the world. After Alexander the Great the so-called Hellinistic culture spread from Cyprus eastward while the Roman culture spread north and westward. Their main gods were also the same, so they were alike in religious matters. They were both male dominated societies.
first, they were in the same time period. secondly, ancient Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt both have natural barriers, like mountains, and deserts. also, they both try to invent ways of communicating, like things to write on(clay tablet for Mesopotamia, and papyrus paper for ancient Egypt).
first, they were in the same time period. secondly, ancient Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt both have natural barriers, like mountains, and deserts. also, they both try to invent ways of communicating, like things to write on(clay tablet for Mesopotamia, and papyrus paper for ancient Egypt).
The major civilization began in Mesopotamia. Civilization began because people had to adapt to modern ways of doing things.
Three ways the early river valley civilizations were alike are: they all developed near rivers, such as the Nile, Tigris and Euphrates, and Indus; they all relied on agriculture as the foundation of their economies; and they all developed complex social structures with rulers and priests holding significant power.
In what ways can soil be alike
The annually renewed soil from the river flooding provided the surplus of food on which a civilisation can develop.
yes its just one simple thing you guys are idiots asking questions
civilizations of india are ways they do something
The developement of ways to copy down events advanced both mesopotamia and egypt this also were the first forms of having a written language
Egypt lies in the fertile Nile River valley which is isolated from most civilizations at the time. Mesopotomian societies such as Sumer were under constant pressure from the outside world, and indeed Sumer fell to the Assriyns(mispelled I know) a barbaric Asian tribe. They both farmed Ancient Civilization thrived in the lands surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. Each had its own distinct views on the social, political, and religious aspects; however, there were many similarities as well. Through this essay, I will illustrate the differences, as well as the similarities of the fascinating early civilizations of Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt. Approximately 5000 B.C.E. cultivation rose from unrest in Mesopotamia, the modern day area of Iran and Iraq, and formed what is arguably the first example of human civilization. It rose upon the banks of the Tigris-Euphrates River, formed by a tribe known as the Sumerians. They were a collection of agriculturally based communities, which coordinated strongly to ease the hardship of farming. Besides Mesopotamia, another civilization arose in northeastern Africa, along the Nile River. Egyptian civilization, formed by 3000 B.C., benefited from trade and technological influence from Mesopotamia, but it produced a quite different society and culture. Because its values and its tightly knit political organization encouraged monumental building, we know more about Egypt than about Mesopotamia, even though the latter was in most respects more important and richer in subsequent heritage. The development of two great early civilizations in the Middle East and North Africa encourages a first effort at comparative analysis. Because of different geography, different degrees of exposure to outside invasion and influence, and different prior beliefs, Egypt and Mesopotamia were in contrast to one another in many ways. Egypt emphasized strong central authority, while Mesopotamian politics shifted more frequently over a substructure of regional city-states. Mesopotamian art focused on less monumental structures, while embracing a definite literary element that Egyptian art needed. These cultural differences can be explained partly by geography: Mesopotamians lacked access to the great stones that Egyptians could import... In Ancient Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt the kings ruled in very different ways. Although the kings of both lands were closely tied to religious institutions they had very different responsibilities to their subjects because of the culture of these areas. In Egypt, a cultural belief in Ma'at, a religious concept of universal harmony and repetition cause the kings to act very differently then the kings of Mesopotamia who have to satisfy the feelings of expansionism caused by their geographic location. These differences are best seen in the way these kings handled cultural development, keeping the support of the people, and even the life expectancy of the kings themselves. There are lots of similarities between Egypt and Mesopotamia in terms of geography and culture. The similarities and differences in geography between Mesopotamia and Egypt had a great impact on their civilizations and way of livings. The ancient Egypt was established on the southeast of Mesopotamia. Egypt's location was touched on the both sides by the Nile river whereas Mesopotamia was located between Tigris and Euphrates river. Both of the civilizations were established and surrounded by water which is the greatest similarities between the two civilizations.
donkeys
Multiplication by an integer is the same as repeated addition.