It ruled slavery to be legal in every state of the Union, and declared that a black person could not be a citizen of the USA.
The Dred Scott decision was totally unfair in the eyes of the Union. Dred Scott had lived in a free state up until his master's death, yet the court still declared him to be a slave. Scott was denied his freedom and rights to citizenry in his own country. This really infuriated other African Americans, and it was considered one of the worst Supreme Court decisions of all time.
The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man
The Supreme Court decision for Scott vs. Sandford set the stage for the Civil War by mobilizing he abolitionist movement. They made the decision on the case in 1857.
The best answer would be that slaves had no right to sue for freedom.
Actually, he was. Despite the decision that held he was property whether he was in a free state or a slave state, his owner freed him which he was legally permitted to do.
The dred Scott decision held that all African Americans, whether free or slave, were not citizens of the US, had no power to sue in court, and that the congress had no constitutional authority to end slavery.
The Dred Scott decision was totally unfair in the eyes of the Union. Dred Scott had lived in a free state up until his master's death, yet the court still declared him to be a slave. Scott was denied his freedom and rights to citizenry in his own country. This really infuriated other African Americans, and it was considered one of the worst Supreme Court decisions of all time.
The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.
In Dred Scott, the U.S. Supreme Court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court.
The Supreme Court declared Scott was a free man
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
Benjamin R. Curtis, one of two dissenters in the Dred Scott decision, resigned from the US Supreme Court on September 30, 1857, as a direct result of his disagreement with the Court's decision. Curtis argued against every holding in the case, especially the notion that African-Americans were not citizens of the US.Curtis also correctly argued that once the Court declared Dred Scott lacked standing to bring the case, its jurisdiction ended and it had no legal grounds to issue a decision.
In the Supreme Court.
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.
Dred Scott
Prior to and during the Dred Scott case, only the lawyer who represented him gave him any help. The Supreme Court ruled that no African Americans, whether free or enslaved, had citizenship in the United States, a decision that enraged abolitionists and empowered slave holders. After the decision, Scott's owner married an abolitionist, who persuaded her to return Scott and his family to his original owners. By this time, his original owners were also anti-slavery, and he and his family were freed.
The Dred Scott case, 1857