the purpose of a land attack was to gain more land
A "culture" is an abstract concept relating to art, language and a way of living. As such it is not sensible to link culture to land features or war. It is people that wage war and features of the land would be an important consideration to the generals when planning the best ground to defend or perhaps from where to attack.
The Persian Empire at its peak stretched from Libya to Central Asia. There was plenty of frontier in those 7,000 km to enter at any point, by land or sea.
An amphibious attack/assault.
Nope. That was the reasons that castles were built- to be hard to attack.
No attack is easy. But, try the classic bishop sac when you have your queen and knight positioned well: 1.Bxh7!!
The Atlantic Ocean made it easy to attack New Amsterdam.
The Mycenaeans attack the Greeks because of land. This is what caused a war.
It was not a joint Land-Sea attack because the Mississippi is a river and not an ocean, but it was a coordinated effort between the army and the naval riverboats.
sharks do not attack people on land. a shark is a water animal so if a shark took the time to atack someone on land, thehy shark would die. sharks do not breathe air.
If the British went to this land called peninsula with a big land that is controlled their would be a big war. instead, they decided to attack the Americans.
the land was fertile