answersLogoWhite
notificationBell

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2010-11-04 04:02:46

Both were against communist aggression. The cold war was no shooting; Vietnam was shooting.

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Your Answer

Related Questions


It was the shooting (killing) portion of the cold war.



The Vietnam war was a warm part of the cold war.


Vietnam was a hot battle of the cold war.


Vietnam was a "hot" battle of the cold war.


To keep Vietnam from going nuclear. Vietnam was part of the cold war.


Vietnam was a "hot" battle of the cold war.


The Cold War; Vietnam was a "hot" battle of the cold war.


The Cold War. Vietnam was a "hot" battle of the cold war.



Vietnam was PART of the cold war; the cold war lasted from '45 to '90.


Vietnam was a shooting war (a hot war). A cold war is a NON-shooting war; a cold war is a "stand-off" between two (or more) adversaries. Technically, Vietnam, being part of the cold war...communism verses the free world...the Vietnam War was a "Hot BATTLE" of the cold war.


The Vietnam War was a product of the "Cold War."


The Vietnam War was part of the cold war.



Vietnam was part of the cold war.


The Vietnam Conflict was an event which occurred during the course of the Cold War.


The Vietnam War was part of the cold war. The cold war was between governments (Nations/Countries).


The Vietnam War wasen't called the Cold War. It's two separate wars.


Instead of exchanging words, they began exchanging bullets in Vietnam. It went from talk (cold war) to shooting (Vietnam).


Yes, many. Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan were among the largest, but there were numerous wars related to the Cold War which were smaller in scale.


The Vietnam War was a "hot" battle of the COLD WAR. The "cold war" was a non-shooting war waged against communism.


Vietnam was a "hot" battle of the "Cold War". The Korea was the first "hot" battle of the "Cold War."