There was an uneven distribution.
The rich were getting richer, while the poor were getting more poor.
Graphs and statistics was very helpful in the distribution of wealth in 1920s.
unequal distribution of wealth.
The question itself is a false premise since wealth is never "distributed," it is only earned (either by hard work or chance by lottery) or is inherited. There is no central planning office that controls wealth and distributes it. That cannot happen unless there is first confiscation and then it is "redistribution."
Uneven prosperity often refers to a society where wealth is not evenly distributed.
Communism is, in theory, a form of government in which wealth is distributed evenly. In practice, corruption is rampant, and the government becomes authoritarian.
Graphs and statistics was very helpful in the distribution of wealth in 1920s.
wealth
Economics.
Economics
unequal distribution of wealth.
that they pay higher taxes that would then be distributed to poor Americans
The question itself is a false premise since wealth is never "distributed," it is only earned (either by hard work or chance by lottery) or is inherited. There is no central planning office that controls wealth and distributes it. That cannot happen unless there is first confiscation and then it is "redistribution."
idk do u no?
The Aristocrats (upper & upper-upper class)
Uneven prosperity often refers to a society where wealth is not evenly distributed.
Sweden is a lagom socialist democracy, which means that wealth is distributed equally to the people.
The communists distributed wealth and equality to appeal their type of government.