The question itself is a false premise since wealth is never "distributed," it is only earned (either by hard work or chance by lottery) or is inherited.
There is no central planning office that controls wealth and distributes it. That cannot happen unless there is first confiscation and then it is "redistribution."
Graphs and statistics was very helpful in the distribution of wealth in 1920s.
There characteristics of a developed country are so many. Some of them include good infrastructure, large population is educated, wealth and income is fairly distributed among others.
Resources are not fairly distributed among members of society.
Economics
Uneven prosperity often refers to a society where wealth is not evenly distributed.
Economics.
Graphs and statistics was very helpful in the distribution of wealth in 1920s.
Economics
There are some who argue that if wealth is distributed fairly then there will be no crime. Probably crime would decrease greatly. However, there are a few greedy people who would still commit crimes anyway.
There characteristics of a developed country are so many. Some of them include good infrastructure, large population is educated, wealth and income is fairly distributed among others.
Market Failure
Market Failure
Market failure
that they pay higher taxes that would then be distributed to poor Americans
Resources are not fairly distributed among members of society.
Economics
idk do u no?