Want this question answered?
John of Leyden believed only adults should be baptized, while Zwingli believed in baptizing infants.
Communion
John of Leyden was a radical Anabaptist, advocating for the establishment of a theocratic state in Munster, driven by religious fanaticism. Ulrich Zwingli, on the other hand, was a Swiss Reformer who promoted a more moderate approach to reforming the church and believed in the separation of church and state. Their views differed in terms of political involvement, religious fervor, and social structure.
Ulrich Zwingli was the person who was credited with starting the Anabaptists. He was concerned that baptism should only be for those who understood the purpose of the rite and that infants and small children should not be allowed to be baptized. He also taught that baptism should only be by immersion.
== == {| ! | One major difference in theological opinion between Zwingli and Luther is on the nature of the Christian sacraments. Many consider Luther to have been the originator of the belief that God's covenants to man are unconditional; Zwingli, on the other hand, proposed that God's covenants were just that--spiritually binding contracts between God and man that were vulnerable to man's relapse into the sinful life that could eventually lead to an annulment of God's part in the contract.[citation needed] E. Brooks Holifield says, When Luther called the sacrament a covenantal seal, he meant that baptism visibly ratified and guaranteed God's promises, as a royal seal authenticated a government document on which it was inscribed. Only secondarily was baptism a pledge of obedience by men. For Zwingli, however, the sacrament was primarily 'a covenant sign which indicates that all those who receive it are willing to amend their lives to follow Christ.[3] For both Luther and Zwingli, the sacrament of baptism was a sign or symbol of God's new Gospel covenant. Their theological differences arise in the relationship between baptism and mankind. ********************************************!!| *! *=== === !|!| *|} |}
Why are the parts of some plants very different from those of others
Why are the parts of some plants very different from those of others
Why are the parts of some plants very different from those of others
The difference between "them" and "those" is that 'them' is an objective pronoun whereas 'those' is a demonstrative pronoun.
NO those are too different organs at different parts of the body
very
No