When the Romans would put fire balls in the cattapult,(don't ask me how.)
They made flamthrowers.
Flamethrowers throw fire or "flames as in flamethrower" so you would never like to be in front of it.
Flamethrowers were not effective in World War I primarily due to the challenges of mobility and the prevailing trench warfare tactics. Their limited range and the need for operators to get close to enemy positions made them vulnerable to counterattacks. Additionally, the effectiveness of flamethrowers was hindered by the muddy and unstable terrain, which often made it difficult to maneuver and deploy them effectively. Lastly, the psychological impact was significant, but the actual tactical utility was limited in the context of the war's overall strategies.
The exact number of deaths caused by flamethrowers in World War I is difficult to determine, as detailed records on specific weapon-related fatalities were not consistently kept. However, it is estimated that flamethrowers were responsible for a relatively small number of deaths compared to other weapons, with some reports suggesting that they killed several hundred soldiers during the conflict. Flamethrowers were primarily used for clearing trenches and bunkers, rather than as a primary weapon of mass destruction.
England won so theres your answer
Flamethrowers have several disadvantages, including limited range due to the short reach of the ignited fuel, the potential for backfire or explosion if not used properly, and the risk of causing unintended collateral damage or starting uncontrollable fires. Additionally, flamethrowers are often heavy and cumbersome to carry, making them impractical for extended use in combat situations. Furthermore, the intense heat and flames produced by flamethrowers can also pose a significant risk to the operator if not handled with extreme caution.
Because infinity ward made modern warfare one and two, triarch made world at war and black ops, triarch likes flamethrowers, infinity ward does not.
Flamethrowers arnt outlawed
Flamethrowers throw fire or "flames as in flamethrower" so you would never like to be in front of it.
Is this a baseball question...if so there is no team called the flamethrowers, nor has there ever been.
no,a gun uses bullets/pellets to shoot,flamethrowers are classified as a special weapon
they are not
yes they do
100,000
Flamethrowers
They burn things.
I do believe that they are not not illegal.
Flamethrowers were not effective in World War I primarily due to the challenges of mobility and the prevailing trench warfare tactics. Their limited range and the need for operators to get close to enemy positions made them vulnerable to counterattacks. Additionally, the effectiveness of flamethrowers was hindered by the muddy and unstable terrain, which often made it difficult to maneuver and deploy them effectively. Lastly, the psychological impact was significant, but the actual tactical utility was limited in the context of the war's overall strategies.