answersLogoWhite

0

Flamethrowers throw fire or "flames as in flamethrower" so you would never like to be in front of it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Military History

What effects did flamethrowers have in World War 1?

England won so theres your answer


What are the disadvantages of flamethrowers?

Flamethrowers have several disadvantages, including limited range due to the short reach of the ignited fuel, the potential for backfire or explosion if not used properly, and the risk of causing unintended collateral damage or starting uncontrollable fires. Additionally, flamethrowers are often heavy and cumbersome to carry, making them impractical for extended use in combat situations. Furthermore, the intense heat and flames produced by flamethrowers can also pose a significant risk to the operator if not handled with extreme caution.


What countries still use flamethrowers today?

Not sure but I do know the PLA still uses them.


How were flamethrowers made?

When the Romans would put fire balls in the cattapult,(don't ask me how.) They made flamthrowers.


Why were flamethrowers not effective in World War 1?

Flamethrowers were not effective in World War I primarily due to the challenges of mobility and the prevailing trench warfare tactics. Their limited range and the need for operators to get close to enemy positions made them vulnerable to counterattacks. Additionally, the effectiveness of flamethrowers was hindered by the muddy and unstable terrain, which often made it difficult to maneuver and deploy them effectively. Lastly, the psychological impact was significant, but the actual tactical utility was limited in the context of the war's overall strategies.