Flamethrowers throw fire or "flames as in flamethrower" so you would never like to be in front of it.
England won so theres your answer
Flamethrowers have several disadvantages, including limited range due to the short reach of the ignited fuel, the potential for backfire or explosion if not used properly, and the risk of causing unintended collateral damage or starting uncontrollable fires. Additionally, flamethrowers are often heavy and cumbersome to carry, making them impractical for extended use in combat situations. Furthermore, the intense heat and flames produced by flamethrowers can also pose a significant risk to the operator if not handled with extreme caution.
Not sure but I do know the PLA still uses them.
When the Romans would put fire balls in the cattapult,(don't ask me how.) They made flamthrowers.
Flamethrowers were not effective in World War I primarily due to the challenges of mobility and the prevailing trench warfare tactics. Their limited range and the need for operators to get close to enemy positions made them vulnerable to counterattacks. Additionally, the effectiveness of flamethrowers was hindered by the muddy and unstable terrain, which often made it difficult to maneuver and deploy them effectively. Lastly, the psychological impact was significant, but the actual tactical utility was limited in the context of the war's overall strategies.
Flamethrowers arnt outlawed
Is this a baseball question...if so there is no team called the flamethrowers, nor has there ever been.
no,a gun uses bullets/pellets to shoot,flamethrowers are classified as a special weapon
they are not
100,000
yes they do
Flamethrowers
They burn things.
I do believe that they are not not illegal.
Americans
they dont
youre an idiot.