Want this question answered?
They treated the US soldiers terribly.
They were held as prisoners of war. What that entailed depended upon the "enemy" who caught them. In Britain we often made prisoners of war work, but on the whole we treated them fairly well. In Japan many prisoners were treated extremely badly and were frequently tortured.
It was not uncommon for rogue commanders to have prisoners executed. This was true for both sides of the conflict.
In the civil war slaves were still slaves but still, they were with the enemy and were as such treated as the enemy.
No.
They treated them very well
They treated the US soldiers terribly.
Very well
They were treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention. Australian prisoners of the Japanese were not.
They were held as prisoners of war. What that entailed depended upon the "enemy" who caught them. In Britain we often made prisoners of war work, but on the whole we treated them fairly well. In Japan many prisoners were treated extremely badly and were frequently tortured.
very porly, only the treatment of Jews was worse.
The axis treated their prisoners horribly. They experimented on them and tortured them. They would burn them and make them freeze to death. they would hardly ever feed them and never give them showers.
they arn't treated very well at all
It was not uncommon for rogue commanders to have prisoners executed. This was true for both sides of the conflict.
very badly, only slightly better than Jews were treated
In the civil war slaves were still slaves but still, they were with the enemy and were as such treated as the enemy.
3,023