In reality, scientists cannot agree as to how the rock formation known as Uluru/Ayers Rock formed. This particular monolith or, more correctly, inselbergdoes not follow any conforming patterns of formation. There are plenty of theories, but none that satisfies the majority of the scientific community.
Uluru, formerly known as Ayers Rock, is an inselberg, meaning "island mountain". One theory is that it is an isolated part left after the slow erosion of an original huge mountain range in Central Australia, the remnants of which can be seen in the Petermann Ranges to the west. This is contradicted by the fact that the arkose sandstone which makes up Uluru is composed of jagged, inconsistently shaped grains of many different sizes, while the feldspars are fresh and shiny. This is evidence of a fairly fast deposit of just a few years, according to flood geologists.
The rock of Uluru is a sandstone, itself derived from an earlier granite landmass. Uluru is notable for the lack of jointing in the rock - hence little screes due to erosion.
In reality, scientists are mystified as to how Uluru/Ayers Rock formed. This particular monolith or, more correctly, inselberg does not follow any conforming patterns of formation. There are plenty of theories, but none that satisfies the majority of the scientific community.
Similarly, it is not known when Uluru was formed.
Scientists cannot agree on how the sandstone of Uluru/Ayers Rock was formed. This particular monolith or, more correctly, inselbergdoes not follow any conforming patterns of formation. There are plenty of theories, but none that satisfies the majority of the scientific community.
Uluru, formerly known as Ayers Rock, is an inselberg, meaning "island mountain". One theory is that it is an isolated part left after the slow erosion of an original huge mountain range in Central Australia, the remnants of which can be seen in the Petermann Ranges to the west. This is contradicted by the fact that the arkose sandstone which makes up Uluru is composed of jagged, inconsistently shaped grains of many different sizes, while the feldspars are fresh and shiny. This is evidence of a fairly fast deposit of just a few years, according to flood geologists.
Sandstone
both
Scientists have not come to any agreement regarding either the age of Uluru, or how it was formed.
Uluru went from red to violet on June 1, 2004, waterfalls on the rocks causing the color change.
Uluru does not have to be any particular size. It is a natural landform, and this is how it is formed - large, bald and rising imposingly above the surrounding plain.
it is located in the National Uluru Kata-tjuta park that is in australia
Sandstone is the most common rock found at Uluru.
both
Uluru is the proper name for a particular rock outcrop. The strata of Uluru are tilted, but they are similar to the rocks of the Mt Olga area.
Scientists have not come to any agreement regarding either the age of Uluru, or how it was formed.
Uluru went from red to violet on June 1, 2004, waterfalls on the rocks causing the color change.
Uluru was not built. It is a naturally occurring feature.Scientists do not know for certain how Uluru was formed, and opinions vary. However, the position of the rock strata and the way the rock crystals lie strongly indicate that Uluru was the result of a massive and sudden flood event.
Uluru does not have to be any particular size. It is a natural landform, and this is how it is formed - large, bald and rising imposingly above the surrounding plain.
it is located in the National Uluru Kata-tjuta park that is in australia
i think uluru has gone bumpy because of the weathering and erosion...
Rocks are formed when magma cools.
Metamorphic rocks are naturally formed. they are formed from natural changes that happen to other rocks.
Sedimentary rocks are formed from the earths surface when sediments hardens into rocks :]