The Bill of Rights
The Federalists wanted a strong central government whereas the Republicans feared a strong central government.
Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist. He and his backers were called the "Hamiltonian's" as opposed to Thomas Jefferson's form of government. He and his followers were called the "Jeffersonians."-The Hamiltonian's wanted a very strong central government as they admired the English aristocracy and the English system of government and wished to see it used as a model.-Hamiltonian's considered the common people ignorant and incapable of self-government.-Hamiltonian's desired high voting qualifications, claiming that unfettered democracy was anarchy.-Hamiltonian's favored a broad interpretation of the Constitution to strengthen the central government at the expense of of state's rights.-Hamiltonian's wanted an expanding bureaucracy.-Hamiltonian's, under certain circumstances, favored restrictions on speech and the press.
George Washington believed that uniting the states under one government was essential for maintaining stability, security, and prosperity. He viewed a strong central government as crucial for fostering unity among the diverse states, preventing conflicts, and effectively managing relationships with foreign powers. Washington feared that without such unity, the nation would remain vulnerable to internal divisions and external threats. Ultimately, he advocated for a federal system that balanced state and national interests to ensure a cohesive and resilient nation.
The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists centered around the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists supported a stronger central government, arguing that the Articles of Confederation were too weak to maintain order and effectively govern the nation. In contrast, Anti-Federalists favored the Articles, fearing that a strong central government would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. The Anti-Federalists advocated for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms, which ultimately influenced the ratification of the Constitution.
When states form compacts, they usually do it in order to form alliances and have a strong relationship with the other states
After the debacle of Shay's Rebellion (another topic entirely), there was a faction favoring a stronger, more centralized government than the confederacy created by the Articles of Confederation. These eventually became called the "Federalist" Party, so called, because they favored a centralized federalgovernment. The Constitution is proof of this, as are The Federalist Papers.
they felt scaryed soem of them also felt happy because they knew they had a strong government
Jackson was against the bank
Federalists believed in a strong central government. Obviously, the anti-federalists believed the very opposite. Some federalists might not have been completely satisfied with the US Constitution, but nobody really could be. The anti-federalists were very displeased with the US Constitution, though.
The Texans felt like most if not all Confederate states about the draft. They believed it went against the right of states which was one of the main reasons for the southern states split from the Union in the first place! The new Confederate Constitution stated that a central government had no right to take away the rights of individual states and the people believed that by forcing them to go to war in a "draft" was unconstitutional!
Essentially, Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation of the Constitution and used a loose interpretation to support a strong Federal Government and Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation, and was in favor of a not so strong Federal Government with more power and rights being given to the States. The stem of much of their disagreement was their interpretations of the Elastic, or Necessary and Proper clause of the Constitution (Article 1 Sec. 8 Clause 18).
Daniel Carroll was one of the Founding Fathers, and one of only two Catholics to sign the Constitution. Carroll believed in the necessity of having a strong leader (the president) and a strong central government (congress), but he believed there should be limits to that power. He did not want the president to be like a king, accountable to no-one; nor did he want the president appointed by the legislature and thus accountable to only a few men. In fact, he did not want the members of congress to be paid a salary by the states, out of concern that the members would feel beholden to those who paid them, and not do their duty for the entire country. Further, he agreed with the doctrine that the powers not specifically given to the Federal Government by the Constitution should be given to the states. While supporting a strong central government that would regulate commerce with the individual states as well as with foreign countries, he also fought to make sure the president was elected "by the people," so that the leader of the United States would not become so powerful that he could never be replaced. Carroll was very close friends and a supporter of George Washington, and he seems to have respected Washington as an ideal leader. But we do not have any specific quotes in which Carroll discussed his views on power: we only have his actions, and the policies he supported.