No if they are good actors
It probably did, but if so it was not reflected in the plays which Shakespeare was writing at the time of Hamnet's death, viz. around 1596. Shakespeare was very close about his feelings and did not tell everyone about them (of if he did, they did not make note of it).
He took over patronage of the group and so its name changed. He and the rest of the royal family were big theatre fans, much more so than Queen Elizabeth, so the King's Men found themselves performing at court a lot more.
The story of the rise to royal power and the fall to blind exile is the myth of Oedipus, and knowledge of that story heightens the audience's involvement in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles (495 B.C.E. - 405 B.C.E.).Specifically, the myth of Theban King Oedipus was familiar to the cultured, theater going Athenian audience of the dramatist's time. Knowledge of the course of events and outcome of Oedipus' life kept the audience's attention focused on how information was revealed instead of being distracted by second guesses as to the outcome. Additionally, it emphasized the interaction of the main themes of fate and free will.
As the head of the government, she set the policy for censorship, particularly for commentary on political issues. Shakespeare was smart enough to steer on the right side of the censors, but some of his contemporaries were less lucky--the authors of the play Isle of Dogs were sent to jail. Censorship had a distinct effect on the content of Shakespeare's work.
If your teacher set this question in these words, his or her command of English is not very good. Go back, get the proper wording and the question will make more sense to you. In any case if you have read or watched any part of the play you should have no difficulty whatsoever naming four people Romeo comes in contact with in the course of it. Because the fact is that in any play, if any two characters are on stage at the same time interacting with each other, both are going to be affected in some way.
One example of a cliffhanger in The Crucible is when John Proctor confesses to committing adultery with Abigail Williams in an effort to save his wife, Elizabeth. The audience is left wondering what the outcome of this confession will be and how it will affect the characters and the unfolding events in the play.
The things people think affect their reactions and they don't think about he outcome with not having a clear mind.
she inflenced John Adams to consider the rights of women
The things people think affect their reactions and they don't think about he outcome with not having a clear mind.
How did the outcome of the scope trial affect the teaching of science in school?
No it doesn't effect the outcome of the result.
Yes
Dependent event :)
Thoughts affect feelings by influencing how you feel about it.
Made bullets for the revolutionary war.
No. The fact that the outcome of one trial does not affect the outcome of any other trial follows from the fact that the trials that are independent. Whether the distribution is binomial or not is totally irrelevant.
Yes.