Using a controlled, scientifically-designed experiments to test theories under laboratory conditions; therefore, the ability to control for certain influences is limited or non-existent. With experiments, scientists can fix some inputs and measure the effects of other inputs in a way that allows ceteris-paribus comparisons.
mcukamam
A question is a question. A hypothesis is a theoretical answer, but one which has not been tested.
Your question is incredibly ambiguous. In general, scientific technique probably refers to the scientific method, which is always used with somewhat little variation.-Find a problem or question of why something happens-Hypothesize the mechanism of why it happens the way it does.-Make predictions of what the hypothesis implies (guess the outcome of experiments)-Conduct experiments based on your hypothesis to see if they match your predictions-Analyze the results and data from your experiment.It may be necessary to repeat the process. And remember, negative results (when your predictions are wrong) are still results--they show you what not to do, and how something ISN'T, which is very important in making progress.
1. Ask a question 2.develop hypothesis 3.make predictions 4.experiment 5.Critique and improve 6.confirmation from other data/experiments
That is a debatable assertion. An experiment is performed to answer a question. If getting the answer to a question is a problem, then yes, experiments solve problems. But it is more likely that the actual problem (whatever it may be) will be solved using the information which is obtained experimentally. For example, the crops are not growing well. We experimentally grow plants under a hundred different circumstances - more nitrogen, more light, more water, less water, etc., and we discover that the plants do better with more magnesium. Now we can solve the crop problem by fertilizing with magnesium. So the experiment did not solve the problem but it did tell us how to solve the problem.
If you mean the scientific method, here you go: 1. State the Problem 2. Research, Gather Information 3. Form a Hypothesis 4. Test the Hypothesis 5. Analyze Data 6. Draw Conclusions
The preceding question will be answered shortly. How many ranks of knights will be preceding the King's Court?
A question is a question. A hypothesis is a theoretical answer, but one which has not been tested.
Anything that occurs to you that hasn't been covered by the preceding discussion.
A theoretical question is one that seeks hypotheses. it looks to possibles rather than probables. theories come from paradigms and help one to examine or seek what is possible ie what is the experience of someone who is living a particular event. In the humanitites, theoretical questions are posed often via theoretical frameworks, investigating experiences.
If this is an actual question - the answer is 'parole.' If this is a theoretical question - it has been posted in another topic area for discussion.
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100722220527AAvtTaz
Short term predictions of earthquake behaviour or even earthquake predictions in general have not occured yet. Many even question if earthquakes will ever be able to be predicted. Even the earthquakes that have supposedly been predicted correctly have controversy behind the method
We could test our hypothesis by means of experimentation, Sorry if you didn't had the information you needed. I didn't understand your question.
This is a question of Theoretical Philosophy. *It varies. Please see English language.
actually there are 5 types of questions they are factual, comparative,developmental.empirical and theoretical
In the years past 2012. This is an older question, since I am answering it in the year 2014!
In a exam or test, it means look at the text/writing preceding the question in order to find the answer.