0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the importance of using sustainable resources?
The importance of using sustainable resources is to protect our natural resources. Using sustainable resources and materials is good for the environment.Because sustainable basically mean something we can keep doing/using, for generation after generation. Non-sustainable, that's things that will run out. Stuff that our kids, or their kids would have to do without. Kinda egotistic to use things up like that.
Is cotton made from sustainable resources?
This is a question I had to do for science some websites said yes and some said no but i think I would go with a yes
Why do you thing the use of resources should be sustainable?
The use of resources should be sustainable because if it is not you will run out of said resource. Depending on the resource this could be extremely disastrous. For example clean water shortages.
Would exploitation be sustainable in Antarctica?
Exploitation of natural resources is banned under the Antarctic Treaty, which preserves all land south of 60 degrees S for scientific pursuits. However, scientific data which is harvested from the continent is a sustainable venture.
Would sustainable development be a positive or negative for the environment?
Sustainable Development would be Positive for the environment. Sustainable means it causes no damage as it time goes on.
Why is milk a natural resource?
Yes, milk is a sustainable resources. Cow-farming is getting more and more popular, especially with the great demand of beef nowadays. With cows, there would be milk. There would always be a ceratin amount of milk that a farmer can milk each day, proving that it is sustainable.
Which is better traditional or sustainable?
Sustainable is the growing priority, even though traditional is a dying trend. Traditional has not been very sustainable, as history would have it. Time is getting to a point where we don't have a choice but to choose sustainable over traditional.
What would happen to the environment to antarctica if mining was allowed?
Sorry, our crystal ball is in the shoppe for repairs, but one could surmise that any development of natural resources in the harshest environment on earth would pose only problems, difficulties, and not be sustainable or profitable.
When would a forest be sustainable?
When supply exceeds demand
How do you stop donation to Greenpeace?
Ring them up or email them and say that you would like to stop donating. Alternatively, do it through your Bank.
Would exploitation be sustainable on a small scale in just some areas?
No, because this would still mean that we are removing necessary resources from Antarctica. Just because we are doing things gradually does not mean that the same effects will not happen, even if they are delayed. That's my opinion anyway
Would sustainable development be a postive or negative for the environment?
positive
