answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How would congress disagree?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did the delegates disagree about representation in Congress How was it resolved?

because the number of representatives that a state would have both houses of congress would be based on that state's population. states with more people would have more votes in congress. this plan would have more favor the large States,


. Liberal and strict constructionists would most likely disagree over which power of Congress?

Regulating the workplace( gradpoint


Why did congress disagree with president johnsons reconstruction plan?

It was hurtful to the poor African Americans who were free.


Why does separation of powers delay decision making?

The President and the Congress may disagree.


What is a congress forms a conference committee in order to?

work out the differences when the two houses disagree


Can you use disagree a sentence?

I would disagree with that last statement.


Who would disagree with Cleopatra?

I would.


When would a bill go to a conference committee in Congress?

A bill will go to a conference committee when both the Senate and the House disagree on the contents of the bill. A conference committee will then be created to resolve the issue.


Is correct to say you are in disagree?

No. The correct way to say that you disagree with something would be "in disagreement."


What did you disagree with in the book of Leviticus?

There is not much I would disagree with in the book of Leviticus. This is a narrative from the Bible.


How can a president block a bill passed by both house of congress?

Yes, it's called a veto. However, if 2/3 of both houses of Congress disagree with the president, they can override his/her veto.


How may a dispute between Congress and the Executive branch be resolved when they disagree over an interpretation of Constitutional powers?

I think the Supreme Court would settle it, because it's the Judicial branch's job to interpret the Constitution.