To the original questioneer:
I've tried to split the wording of this question but it's still not understandable:
"How would oxygen be represented in the f--ormula equation for the reaction of methane and oxygen to yield carbon dioxide and water -- A chemical reaction has NOT occurred if the products have -- "
So could the questioneer please rephrase it?
JdQ
When a compound produces.
A chemical equation shows that chemical reaction has occurred as new substances have been formed from the reagents. A chemical equation has two sides before reaction and after reaction, if there is any change from the before reaction side to the after reaction side, it indicates that a chemical reaction has just occurred.
It depends: just try to relate, try to write a chemical equation for and see if there are byproducts. Most likely, if the same chemical still has its same properties After the reaction, a chemical reaction has not occurred.
A chemical equation can be used to describe a chemical change. For instance when iron combines with oxygen to form iron (III) oxide (rust), a chemical change has occurred. It can be written as a chemical formula: 4 Fe + 3 O2 --> 2 Fe2O3
chemical change occurred when new chemical substance was created
It depends: just try to relate, try to write a chemical equation for and see if there are byproducts. Most likely, if the same chemical still has its same properties After the reaction, a chemical reaction has not occurred.
no unless there is a chemical change but there isn't. only a physical change has occurred
yes it s an evidence that a chemical change has been occurred
Chemical change not a physical. A CHEMICAL CHANGE
The same chemical properties as the reactants.
CO
False