Because then it would damage the circle of life!
That would affect the food cycle, less production.
there would be no more red pandas
No, as the groundhog is not present in all the world. Mainly the USA.
For the most part, the extinction of the species would not really impact the world to much degree, besides the small disruption it would entail on the local ecosystem
the extinction of pandas would affect us byother animals would not be able to eat themwe would have a lot of bamboo that we do not needwe would have a big forest that they left
The world without sharks would mean that there would not be shark skin purses, shark fin soup and no more sharks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!):
The white tiger would normally control the population of its prey, but facing extinction, the tigers prey will flourish and overpopulate. (: Hope that helps.
The whole world is done, sharks are extremely important, they keep EVERYTHING in balance. The ocean life would reproduce and ther would be large amounts of everything. Well sharks are very important to the underwater ecosystem, and without them the fish and other shark prey would over populate and which would affect the rest of the food chain.
Almost certainly. Anytime you remove an apex predator from the environment, the entire food chain suffers. But happily, neither species are in any danger of extinction now. The world population of black bears is over 900,000, that of the brown bear over 300,000. Source; World Wildlife Fund
The way it would affect the ecological balance is whatever eats the red wolf would die and whatever ate that would die and it goes on and on and on
the end of the world as we kno it
Since the sun won't be extinct for another 4 billion years or so, it would have to be considered a moot question.