You would do the experiment. Ex. If chocolate is given to kids then, there heartbeat will be faster. To test the hypothesis you have to give chocolate to kids, then measure there heartbeat.
Hypothesis.
The hypothesis ithink
The hypothesis ithink
Not unless its tested by experimentation. If its tested by experimentation. And then if found to be true its no longer just a hypothesis. And if found to be false it becomes an invalid hypothesis, which anyone in their right mind would withdraw as a hypothesis.
That is progress, you start with a hypothesis, e.g. the moon is made of cheese, then it is tested by experiments to see if it's right. If the experiment says it's wrong, that is something that does not have to be tested again.
No, scientists do not test a hypothesis by drawing conclusions; instead, they test it through experimentation and observation. A hypothesis is an educated guess that can be tested, and the results of these tests determine whether the hypothesis is supported or refuted. Only after analyzing the data and results can scientists draw conclusions about the validity of the hypothesis. This process is essential for ensuring scientific rigor and reliability.
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
hypothesis have bean tested confirm many time by many scientists woth similar results each time
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
It begins as a hypothesis, only after it has been thoroughly tested over time can it be called a theory. (Note that what non-scientists call a theory is actually just a hypothesis.)
conducting experiment
A hypothesis that can't be tested, can't be proved.