0
What else can I help you with?
Can a hypothesis that has been rejected be of any value to scientists?
Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed
Why do scientists use hypothesis?
The scientific method is how scientists make an hypothesis to focus their observations.
Which is more helpful proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
To do it right
Why might scientists rethink a hypothesis?
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
Do scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?
yes scientists consider hypothesis to be a fact
Is the rejection of a hypothesis help to scientists?
Yes, it is helpful because they can learn from their mistakes and not do the same mistake again.
Why is the rejection of a hypothesis helpful to scientist?
A rejected hypothesis could be helpful to a scientist because it helps them create a theory by process of elimination.
What is it called when scientists state shearer their data confirmed or rejected the hypothesis?
When scientists state that their data confirmed or rejected a hypothesis, it is typically referred to as "hypothesis testing." This process involves analyzing the collected data to determine whether it supports or contradicts the proposed hypothesis. The outcome can lead to the acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis, contributing to the scientific understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
Can a hypothesis that has been rejected be of any value to scientists?
Yes. But usually a hypothesis (if, then, because statement) is changed overtime to establish a conclusion on the investigation. The point of the collection of the data is to show whether or not the hypothesis was supported, and if not needs to be corrected/modified. Certain parts may still be helpful/kept but in most cases it is changed
Why do scientists use hypothesis?
The scientific method is how scientists make an hypothesis to focus their observations.
What is rejection region?
The rejection region, also known as the critical region, is a set of values in statistical hypothesis testing that leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis. It is determined by the significance level (alpha) and encompasses the extreme values of the test statistic that are unlikely to occur if the null hypothesis is true. If the calculated test statistic falls within this region, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. The size and location of the rejection region depend on the chosen significance level and the type of statistical test being used.
What can scientists do if their tests do not support their hypothesis?
Amend or discard the hypothesis
What can scientists do if their test do not support their hypothesis?
Amend or discard the hypothesis
Which is more helpful proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
To do it right
Why might scientists rethink a hypothesis?
The scientists might Rethink there Hypothesis because when they collect more data they would know more about what they are doing so they would rethink there hypothesis
Do scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?
yes scientists consider hypothesis to be a fact
How does a scientists theory differ from a hypothesis?
Theories are proven. Hypothesis are ideas.
